Takahashi M, Freed A N, Croxton T L
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Respir Physiol. 1995 Jan;99(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(94)00076-c.
Tracheal epithelia of different mammalian species differ widely with regard to the relative rates of Na+ absorption and Cl- secretion. However, the short circuit current, a measure of total ion transport, appears to be consistently greater in large than in small mammals. Thus, we hypothesized that the in vivo tracheal electrical potential difference (PD) would vary among species as a function of body mass (M). To test this hypothesis we measured PD in ten mammalian species that ranged 1000-fold in mass. The results in mV (mean +/- SE, lumen negative) were: 11.4 +/- 1.0 in mice; 11.6 +/- 1.2 in gerbils; 12.9 +/- 1.4 in rats; 19.3 +/- 0.9 in guinea pigs; 27.2 +/- 2.2 in ferrets; 23.0 +/- 1.6 in cats; 27.0 +/- 0.6 in rabbits; 32.5 +/- 2.6 in dogs; 37.0 +/- 1.9 in sheep; and 49.0 +/- 3.3 in pigs. Log-log correlation analysis of mean PD (in mV) and M (in kg) yielded PD = 20.9 M0.19 (r = 0.96, P < 0.001). Analysis of published short circuit current (SCC, in microA/cm2) data revealed a similar relationship: SCC = 38.2 M0.21. Thus, the transepithelial electrical potential and active charge transport by the tracheal epithelium are allometric variables that may have direct physiological significance. These results raise questions regarding the importance of net osmotic solute and water transport across the tracheal epithelium.
不同哺乳动物物种的气管上皮在Na⁺吸收和Cl⁻分泌的相对速率方面存在很大差异。然而,短路电流作为总离子运输的一种度量,在大型哺乳动物中似乎始终大于小型哺乳动物。因此,我们推测体内气管的电势差(PD)会因物种而异,是体重(M)的函数。为了验证这一假设,我们测量了体重相差1000倍的十种哺乳动物物种的PD。结果(以mV为单位,管腔为负,平均值±标准误)如下:小鼠为11.4±1.0;沙鼠为11.6±1.2;大鼠为12.9±1.4;豚鼠为19.3±0.9;雪貂为27.2±2.2;猫为23.0±1.6;兔子为27.0±0.6;狗为32.5±2.6;绵羊为37.0±1.9;猪为49.0±3.3。对平均PD(以mV为单位)和M(以kg为单位)进行对数-对数相关分析,得到PD = 20.9M⁰.¹⁹(r = 0.96,P < 0.001)。对已发表的短路电流(SCC,以微安/平方厘米为单位)数据进行分析,发现了类似的关系:SCC = 38.2M⁰.²¹。因此,气管上皮的跨上皮电势和主动电荷运输是异速生长变量,可能具有直接的生理意义。这些结果引发了关于气管上皮净渗透溶质和水运输重要性的问题。