Gilbert D B, Ludlow J B, Tyndall D A, Bailey L, Phillips C
Department of Orthodontics, University of North Carolina, School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill 27599-7450, USA.
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9(4):311-21.
This preclinical study was designed to evaluate 20-degree lateral cephalometric and posteroanterior cephalometric techniques with digital subtraction enhancement for their ability to detect 1-, 2-, and 3-mm shifts in condylar position in two of three planes of space (horizontal or transverse and vertical). The model used was a dry human skull with a complete mandible mounted on a microscopic stage with positioning accuracy to 0.1 mm in x, y, and z planes. Analysis of variance showed no significant difference from expected values in the transverse plane (posteroanterior cephalogram only). There were significant differences in the sagittal plane (20-degree lateral cephalogram only) for the 2- and 3-mm shifts (P < .001). There were no significant differences among expected values in the vertical plane for individual increments or for increment comparisons. The magnitude of standard deviations and of the absolute value of differences indicates markedly increased variability for both techniques as compared to tomograms produced with cephalostat repositioning. The authors conclude that even with precise repositioning and digital subtraction enhancement, cephalometric radiographs are inadequate for clinical monitoring of condylar position.
这项临床前研究旨在评估采用数字减影增强技术的20度侧位头影测量和正位头影测量技术,检测髁突在三个空间平面(水平或横向和垂直)中的两个平面上1毫米、2毫米和3毫米移位的能力。所使用的模型是一个干燥的人类头骨,带有完整的下颌骨,安装在一个显微镜载物台上,在x、y和z平面上的定位精度为0.1毫米。方差分析表明,在横向平面(仅正位头影图)上与预期值无显著差异。在矢状平面(仅20度侧位头影图)上,2毫米和3毫米移位存在显著差异(P < .001)。在垂直平面上,对于各个增量或增量比较,预期值之间无显著差异。标准差的大小和差异绝对值表明,与使用头颅定位器重新定位产生的断层扫描相比,这两种技术的变异性明显增加。作者得出结论,即使采用精确的重新定位和数字减影增强技术,头影测量X线片仍不足以用于髁突位置的临床监测。