Lind L, Berne C, Pollare T, Lithell H
Department of Internal Medicine, Kungsgärdets Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Feb;9(2):137-41.
To evaluate the metabolic effects of two anti-hypertensive agents with different actions, nifedipine 20 mg twice daily and furosemide 60 mg twice daily, 23 patients with untreated essential hypertension performed a double-blind, cross-over study in treatment periods of 5 months. Metabolic effects were evaluated by serum lipoprotein determinations, the intravenous glucose tolerance test and the hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp technique. Nifedipine and furosemide reduced blood pressure to the same extent (-14 to -15 mm Hg for supine SBP and -9 to -10 mm Hg for supine DBP, both P < 0.0001). Whereas both drugs significantly increased the levels of glycolysated haemoglobin (HbA1c, +0.24%, P < 0.005 for nifedipine and +0.43%, P < 0.001 for furosemide), only furosemide increased fasting blood glucose (+0.3 mmol/L, P < 0.01) and fasting insulin (+2.2 mU/L, P < 0.05) but impaired the early insulin response to i.v. glucose (-15 mU/L, P < 0.05). Insulin sensitivity on the other hand was significantly impaired by nifedipine treatment only (-1.6 mg/kg/min, P < 0.01). Whereas treatment with nifedipine did not change serum lipids, furosemide caused an increase in serum cholesterol (+0.2 mmol/L, P < 0.05) because of a rise in the LDL fraction (+0.32 mmol/L, P < 0.001). The insignificant change in heart rate induced by nifedipine treatment correlated with the change in HbA1c (r = 0.50, P = 0.05) and was inversely related to the change in insulin sensitivity (r = -0.56, P < 0.05). In conclusion, both furosemide and nifedipine caused abnormalities in glucose metabolism. In the nifedipine group the effects on glucose metabolism were related to the occurrence of tachycardia suggesting that sympathetic nerve activation could be involved in the metabolic impairments.
为评估两种作用不同的抗高血压药物(硝苯地平每日2次,每次20毫克,速尿每日2次,每次60毫克)的代谢效应,23例未经治疗的原发性高血压患者进行了一项为期5个月的双盲交叉研究。通过血清脂蛋白测定、静脉葡萄糖耐量试验和高胰岛素正常血糖钳夹技术评估代谢效应。硝苯地平和速尿降低血压的程度相同(仰卧位收缩压降低14至15毫米汞柱,仰卧位舒张压降低9至10毫米汞柱,P均<0.0001)。两种药物均显著提高糖化血红蛋白水平(硝苯地平升高0.24%,P<0.005;速尿升高0.43%,P<0.001),但只有速尿升高空腹血糖(升高0.3毫摩尔/升,P<0.01)和空腹胰岛素(升高2.2毫国际单位/升,P<0.05),并损害静脉注射葡萄糖后的早期胰岛素反应(降低15毫国际单位/升,P<0.05)。另一方面,仅硝苯地平治疗显著损害胰岛素敏感性(降低1.6毫克/千克/分钟,P<0.01)。硝苯地平治疗未改变血脂,而速尿导致血清胆固醇升高(升高0.2毫摩尔/升,P<0.05),原因是低密度脂蛋白部分升高(升高0.32毫摩尔/升,P<0.001)。硝苯地平治疗引起的心率无显著变化与糖化血红蛋白的变化相关(r=0.50,P=0.05),并与胰岛素敏感性的变化呈负相关(r=-0.56,P<0.05)。总之,速尿和硝苯地平均导致糖代谢异常。在硝苯地平组中,对糖代谢的影响与心动过速的发生有关,提示交感神经激活可能参与了代谢损害。