Marean G C, Cunningham D, Burt J M, Beecher M D, Rubel E W
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
Hear Res. 1995 Feb;82(2):267-76. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)00183-q.
Previous work from our laboratory [Marean et al. (1993) Hear. Res. 71, 125-136] has shown that a 10 day dose of 200 mg/kg/day kanamycin produced damage to the basal 34% of the starling basilar papilla. We also observed that repeating the dosing schedule following a 4 month survival period resulted in significantly less damage to the regenerated auditory epithelium. The present study investigated whether or not this apparent resistance was the result of a tendency for regenerated hair cells to be less susceptible to kanamycin ototoxicity, or if other, systemic factors may be involved. Eight European starlings were given subcutaneous injections of 200 mg/kg/day kanamycin for 10 days. Serum levels of kanamycin were measured at the time of sacrifice for all birds, and the basilar papillae of all birds were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two of these birds (Group 1) were sacrificed immediately following the dosing period. Two of the birds were allowed to survive for 60 days (Group 2). Two of the birds were redosed with 200 mg/kg/day for 10 days after 60 days survival (Group 3). Finally, two birds were redosed with 250 mg/kg/day until serum levels of kanamycin were the same as Group 1 when sacrificed (> 9 micrograms/ml). The SEM results showed that the regenerated auditory epithelium of the birds dosed a second time sustained less damage compared to previously untreated ears, even though the dosing regimen was the same (Group 3 versus Group 1). The regenerated auditory epithelium of birds dosed a second time sustained the same damage as previously untreated animals when the dosage was increased to attain similar serum levels (Group 4 versus Group 1). These results suggest metabolic changes occur in the starling in response to the initial dose of kanamycin which do not necessarily involve changes in hair cell resistance to ototoxicity.
我们实验室之前的研究工作[马伦等人(1993年),《听觉研究》第71卷,第125 - 136页]表明,连续10天每天给予200毫克/千克的卡那霉素会对欧椋鸟基底乳头的底部34%造成损伤。我们还观察到,在4个月的存活期后重复给药方案,对再生听觉上皮的损伤明显减少。本研究调查了这种明显的抗性是再生毛细胞对卡那霉素耳毒性敏感性降低的结果,还是涉及其他全身因素。八只欧洲椋鸟皮下注射200毫克/千克/天的卡那霉素,持续10天。在所有鸟类处死后测量卡那霉素的血清水平,并通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查所有鸟类的基底乳头。其中两只鸟(第1组)在给药期结束后立即处死。两只鸟存活60天(第2组)。两只鸟在存活60天后再次给予200毫克/千克/天的剂量,持续10天(第3组)。最后,两只鸟再次给予250毫克/千克/天的剂量,直到处死时卡那霉素的血清水平与第1组相同(>9微克/毫升)。扫描电子显微镜结果显示,即使给药方案相同(第3组与第1组相比),第二次给药的鸟类再生听觉上皮受到的损伤比未处理过的耳朵要小。当剂量增加以达到相似的血清水平时,第二次给药的鸟类再生听觉上皮受到的损伤与未处理过的动物相同(第4组与第1组相比)。这些结果表明,欧椋鸟对初始剂量的卡那霉素会发生代谢变化,这不一定涉及毛细胞对耳毒性抗性的改变。