Suppr超能文献

[耳鼻喉科手术及口腔医学中的抗生素预防]

[Antibiotic prophylaxis in ORL surgery and oral medicine].

作者信息

Legent F, Arnould J F

机构信息

Service de clinique ORL et Chirurgie cervico-faciale, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes.

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1994;13(5 Suppl):S100-9. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(05)81784-8.

Abstract

Postsurgical infection has always been a cause for major concern in ENT surgery. Papers on the topic allowed to identify indications for antibiotic prophylaxis. In ear surgery, in the absence of prior infection (stapes surgery, medium dry ear surgery), studies' results are not in favour of antibiotic prophylaxis. On the other hand, however, when the ear is inflamed or infected, the use of antibiotics is indicated, if possible after having first taken a sample. For nose and sinus surgery, antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be worthless in the absence of a prolonged packing. If a packing has to be maintained or if a transplant is used, an antibiotic administration has to be considered; the most appropriate antibiotic and its mode of use still have to be specified. In case of facial trauma, antibiotic prophylaxis using cefazolin reduces the risk of infection of paraymphysis fractures and angle fractures. The postoperative course after tonsillectomy is simplified by a prolonged antibiotic administration based on ampicillin. In clean cervico-facial surgery, without buccopharyngeal opening, the antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be worthless. In the opposite, antibiotherapy is required in case of buccopharyngeal opening. Indeed the presence of potential pathogenic bacteria in the buccopharyngeal cavity, the difficulties of mucosa closing, the importance of the tumoral extension, the length of the procedure, radiotherapy and use of myocutaneous flaps may all be the cause of a high infection rate (80%) in the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis. Two types of antibiotics seem to be suitable, cefazolin and clindamycin. Antibiotics active against Gram negative bacteria seem to be useless. There is a disagreement concerning the duration of antibiotic administration. The populations studied are too small to obtain significant results. Both points of view (prolonged antibiotic administration or true antibiotic prophylaxis) can be considered. Only large scale prospective studies with an adequate methodology will provide credible data for this debate.

摘要

术后感染一直是耳鼻喉科手术中主要关注的问题。关于该主题的论文有助于确定抗生素预防的指征。在耳部手术中,若不存在先前感染(镫骨手术、中耳干性手术),研究结果不支持使用抗生素预防。然而,另一方面,当耳部发炎或感染时,则需使用抗生素,如有可能应先取样。对于鼻和鼻窦手术,在没有长时间填塞的情况下,抗生素预防似乎并无价值。如果必须进行填塞或使用移植材料,则必须考虑使用抗生素;最适宜的抗生素及其使用方式仍有待明确。对于面部创伤,使用头孢唑林进行抗生素预防可降低腮腺周围骨折和角部骨折的感染风险。基于氨苄西林的长时间抗生素给药可简化扁桃体切除术后的病程。在清洁的颈面部手术中,若无口咽开口,抗生素预防似乎并无价值。反之,若存在口咽开口则需要进行抗菌治疗。实际上,口咽腔内存在潜在病原菌、黏膜闭合困难、肿瘤扩展程度、手术时间长短、放疗以及肌皮瓣的使用,这些都可能是在未进行抗生素预防时感染率较高(80%)的原因。两种抗生素似乎较为适用,即头孢唑林和克林霉素。对革兰氏阴性菌有活性的抗生素似乎并无用处。关于抗生素给药时长存在分歧。所研究的人群规模过小,无法得出显著结果。两种观点(长时间抗生素给药或真正的抗生素预防)都可考虑。只有采用适当方法的大规模前瞻性研究才能为这场争论提供可靠数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验