Suppr超能文献

用于颞下颌关节紊乱病的诊断和监测测试的有效性。

Validity of diagnostic and monitoring tests used for temporomandibular disorders.

作者信息

Lund J P, Widmer C G, Feine J S

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montéal, Qúebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 1995 Apr;74(4):1133-43. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740041501.

Abstract

Currently, diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) depends on a comprehensive history and physical examination, supplemented, when indicated, by images of hard and soft tissues. However, there are electronic diagnostic devices being marketed to acquire other measures described as relevant to TMD and to use these for diagnosis of TMD and for monitoring the effects of treatment. This paper reviews the capacity of several devices to measure these variables accurately and reliably and to assess the theoretical basis of each of these tests. Diagnostic ability was established, when possible, according to the commonly accepted measures of sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values. It was found that many tests lack theoretical validity, that measurement validity tends to be poor, and that diagnostic ability can be even worse than chance, because of a high percentage of false-positive diagnoses. Based on these findings, the use of these instruments in clinical practice is inappropriate at this time and may lead to the treatment of large numbers of subjects who have no disorder.

摘要

目前,颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的诊断依赖于全面的病史和体格检查,必要时辅以软硬组织影像检查。然而,市场上有一些电子诊断设备,可获取其他被认为与TMD相关的测量指标,并将其用于TMD的诊断和治疗效果监测。本文回顾了几种设备准确可靠地测量这些变量的能力,并评估了每项检测的理论基础。在可能的情况下,根据普遍接受的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预测值等指标来确定诊断能力。结果发现,许多检测缺乏理论效度,测量效度往往较差,而且由于假阳性诊断比例较高,诊断能力甚至可能比随机诊断更差。基于这些发现,目前在临床实践中使用这些仪器是不合适的,可能会导致对大量无疾病患者进行治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验