Ni Q, Xu H, Partilla J S, de Costa B R, Rice K C, Borsodi A, Hosztafi S, Rothman R B
Clinical Psychopharmacology Section, NIDA/NIH Addiction Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.
Neurochem Res. 1994 Sep;19(9):1159-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00965150.
Previous work from our lab identified two subtypes of the opioid kappa receptor. Whereas the kappa1 receptor can be labeled by [3H]U69,593 (5 alpha,7 alpha,8 beta-(-)- N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro(4,5)dec-8-yl]-phenyl- benzeneacetamide), the kappa2 receptor can be labeled by [125I]OXY (6 beta-125iodo-3,14-dihydroxy-17-cyclopropylmethyl-4,5 alpha-epoxymorphinan). Other data demonstrate that [125I]IOXY, like [3H]bremazocine, labels two populations of kappa2 receptors in guinea pig brain: kappa2a and kappa2b binding sites. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that certain dihydrocodeinone and oxicodone derivatives, which have been shown to irreversibly block low affinity [3H]naloxone binding sites, would also bind irreversibly to opioid kappa receptor subtypes. We also tested the novel irreversible mu receptor antagonist, clocinnamox (14 beta-(p-chlorocinnamoylamino)-7,8-dihydro-N-cyclopropylmethylno rmorphinone mesylate). Wash-resistant inhibition (WRI) assays were conducted to detect apparent irreversible inhibition. The proportion of WRI attributable to inhibition of receptor binding, termed receptor inhibition (RI), was calculated by the equation: RI = WRI (wash-resistant inhibition) - SI (supernatant inhibition or inhibition attributable to residual drug.) Dihydrocodeinone-hydrazone, dihydrocodeinone-oxime and naloxone-3-OMe-oxime failed to produce any wash-resistant inhibition of kappa receptor binding. In contrast, preincubating guinea pig membranes with 1 microM clocinnamox produced a substantial degree of wash-resistant inhibition (greater than 90%) at kappa1 and kappa2 binding sites. However, as indicated by supernatant inhibition values of 70% to 90%, there was a large amount of residual clocinnamox which remained despite the use of an extensive washing procedure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们实验室之前的研究确定了阿片κ受体的两种亚型。κ1受体可被[3H]U69,593(5α,7α,8β-(-)-N-甲基-N-[7-(1-吡咯烷基)-1-氧杂螺(4,5)癸-8-基]-苯基-苯乙酰胺)标记,而κ2受体可被[125I]OXY(6β-125碘-3,14-二羟基-17-环丙基甲基-4,5α-环氧吗啡喃)标记。其他数据表明,[125I]IOXY与[3H]布瑞马唑嗪一样,可标记豚鼠脑中κ2受体的两个群体:κ2a和κ2b结合位点。在本研究中,我们检验了这样一个假设:某些已被证明能不可逆地阻断低亲和力[3H]纳洛酮结合位点的二氢可待因酮和羟考酮衍生物,也会不可逆地与阿片κ受体亚型结合。我们还测试了新型不可逆μ受体拮抗剂氯西诺肟(14β-(对氯肉桂酰氨基)-7,8-二氢-N-环丙基甲基去甲吗啡酮甲磺酸盐)。进行耐洗抑制(WRI)试验以检测明显的不可逆抑制。耐洗抑制中归因于受体结合抑制的比例,称为受体抑制(RI),通过以下公式计算:RI = WRI(耐洗抑制)- SI(上清液抑制或归因于残留药物的抑制)。二氢可待因酮腙、二氢可待因酮肟和纳洛酮-3-OMe-肟未能对κ受体结合产生任何耐洗抑制。相反,用1μM氯西诺肟预孵育豚鼠膜,在κ1和κ2结合位点产生了相当程度的耐洗抑制(大于90%)。然而,从70%至90%的上清液抑制值可以看出,尽管使用了广泛的洗涤程序,仍有大量残留的氯西诺肟。(摘要截短于250字)