Suppr超能文献

一项口服维拉帕米作为化疗增敏剂逆转难治性骨髓瘤患者耐药性的III期随机研究。西南肿瘤协作组研究。

A phase III randomized study of oral verapamil as a chemosensitizer to reverse drug resistance in patients with refractory myeloma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

作者信息

Dalton W S, Crowley J J, Salmon S S, Grogan T M, Laufman L R, Weiss G R, Bonnet J D

机构信息

University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson.

出版信息

Cancer. 1995 Feb 1;75(3):815-20. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950201)75:3<815::aid-cncr2820750311>3.0.co;2-r.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma is considered to be a drug responsive disease; however, there is no cure for this disease and virtually all patients will develop drug resistance. One form of drug resistance that has been documented is the multidrug resistance phenotype or MDR.

METHODS

A randomized trial of the combination of vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) and VAD plus oral verapamil (VAD/v) in drug refractory multiple myeloma patients was performed by the Southwestern Oncology Group. Verapamil was used as a chemosensitizing agent to attempt to overcome or prevent MDR and improve the therapeutic outcome.

RESULTS

Response rates between the two treatment arms were similar with an overall response rate of 41% for the VAD alone arm and 36% for the VAD/v arm. Overall survival of patients was also similar with a median survival of 10 months for the VAD arm and 13 months for the VAD/v arm. The toxicity profile was also similar for both treatments, with myelosuppression being the dose-limiting toxicity. No significant correlation was observed between expression of P-glycoprotein, serum verapamil levels, and response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

No beneficial effect was observed from the addition of oral verapamil to the VAD chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of drug-resistant myeloma patients. More effective and less toxic chemosensitizers are needed to study the role of chemosensitizers in reversing MDR in the clinic.

摘要

背景

多发性骨髓瘤被认为是一种对药物有反应的疾病;然而,这种疾病无法治愈,几乎所有患者都会产生耐药性。已被记录的一种耐药形式是多药耐药表型或MDR。

方法

西南肿瘤协作组对难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者进行了一项关于长春新碱、阿霉素和地塞米松(VAD)联合用药以及VAD加口服维拉帕米(VAD/v)的随机试验。维拉帕米用作化学增敏剂,试图克服或预防MDR并改善治疗效果。

结果

两个治疗组之间的缓解率相似,单独使用VAD组的总缓解率为41%,VAD/v组为36%。患者的总生存期也相似,VAD组的中位生存期为10个月,VAD/v组为13个月。两种治疗的毒性特征也相似,骨髓抑制是剂量限制性毒性。未观察到P-糖蛋白表达、血清维拉帕米水平与治疗反应之间存在显著相关性。

结论

在VAD化疗方案中添加口服维拉帕米治疗耐药骨髓瘤患者未观察到有益效果。需要更有效且毒性更小的化学增敏剂来研究化学增敏剂在临床中逆转MDR的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验