Ganjoo R K, Williams A, Malpas J S
Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Department of Medical Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1995;35(4):343-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00689456.
A total of 15 patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM; 4 primary unresponsive and 11 relapsed and resistant to re-induction/salvage therapy) received i.v. vincristine on day 1 and oral etoposide daily for 4 days, the treatment being repeated at 3-weekly intervals. The patients were re-assessed after three cycles of chemotherapy, and non-responders received no further therapy. There was no complete or partial response. A minimal response was seen in two patients, and two others showed stable disease. None of the responses was sustained, and all patients eventually had progressive disease. It is concluded that combination chemotherapy with vincristine and oral etoposide given by this schedule is unlikely to be of any value in refractory myeloma.
共有15例难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者(4例初治无效,11例复发且对再诱导/挽救治疗耐药)在第1天接受静脉注射长春新碱,口服依托泊苷,每日1次,共4天,每3周重复治疗。化疗三个周期后对患者进行重新评估,无反应者不再接受进一步治疗。无完全缓解或部分缓解病例。2例患者有最小反应,另外2例病情稳定。所有反应均未持续,所有患者最终均出现疾病进展。结论是,按照此方案给予长春新碱和口服依托泊苷联合化疗对难治性骨髓瘤不太可能有任何价值。