Norman J, Gahtan V, Franz M, Bramson R
Department of Surgery, University of South Florida School of Medicine, Tampa.
Am Surg. 1995 Feb;61(2):146-50.
The routine use of arteriography following penetrating injuries to the extremities has declined in popularity in recent years. A careful physical examination coupled with Doppler-derived blood pressure has been shown to be sufficient to determine the presence of significant vascular injuries in most circumstances. Evaluating for occult vascular injuries in the presence of a complex wound involving the fracture of a long bone, however, seems to be an exception to this trend in management. This study was undertaken to ascertain the incidence of occult versus clinically apparent vascular injuries in patients suffering gun shot wounds (GSW) to the extremities that were associated with a long bone fracture. To address the value of invasive arteriographic evaluation, physical examination (pulse palpation, Doppler-derived limb blood pressure) was compared to arteriography in 75 consecutive patients following a GSW that resulted in fracture of the tibia/fibula (n = 28), femur (n = 19), humerus (n = 17), or radius/ulna (n = 11). Fourteen patients (19%) had an abnormal physical examination, with 13 (93%) of these also having an abnormal arteriogram. Of the 61 (81%) patients with a normal physical examination, an occult vascular injury was found on subsequent arteriography in 17 (28%). These occult injuries were classified as minor (intimal flap less than one-fourth the diameter of the vessel, segmental narrowing, noncritical branch vessel injury) or major (large intimal flap, occlusion, pseudoaneurysm, A-V fistula). The majority (83%) of occult injuries were minor and did not require operative intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
近年来,四肢穿透伤后常规进行动脉造影的做法已不再流行。事实证明,在大多数情况下,仔细的体格检查加上多普勒衍生血压足以确定是否存在严重血管损伤。然而,在存在涉及长骨骨折的复杂伤口时,评估隐匿性血管损伤似乎是这种管理趋势的一个例外。本研究旨在确定伴有长骨骨折的四肢枪伤(GSW)患者中隐匿性与临床明显血管损伤的发生率。为了探讨侵入性动脉造影评估的价值,对75例因GSW导致胫腓骨骨折(n = 28)、股骨骨折(n = 19)、肱骨骨折(n = 17)或桡尺骨骨折(n = 11)的连续患者进行了体格检查(脉搏触诊、多普勒衍生肢体血压)与动脉造影的比较。14例患者(19%)体格检查异常,其中13例(93%)动脉造影也异常。在61例(81%)体格检查正常的患者中,17例(28%)随后的动脉造影发现隐匿性血管损伤。这些隐匿性损伤分为轻度(内膜瓣小于血管直径的四分之一、节段性狭窄、非关键分支血管损伤)或重度(大内膜瓣、闭塞、假性动脉瘤、动静脉瘘)。大多数(83%)隐匿性损伤为轻度,无需手术干预。(摘要截断于250字)