Russell R I, Helms P J
Portex Anaesthesia, Hospital for Sick Children, London, UK.
Eur Respir J. 1994 Nov;7(11):2073-6.
Several techniques exist for assessing chest wall movements in children, that incorporate different measurement principles. Although the output from such devices appears very similar, the comparability of data from different devices needs to be evaluated. We have investigated the simultaneous measurement of chest wall movement using three different devices in 12 children recovering from intensive care. The devices used were inductance plethysmography (assessing thoracic cross-sectional area), magnetometers (assessing thoracic diameter), and a Hall device strain guage (assessing thoracic circumference). Measurements of respiratory timing and of phase angle between rib cage and abdomen in these patients showed a close agreement between devices in ventilated patients. However, occasional inconsistencies occurred in patients who were breathing spontaneously. We suggest that it may not always be appropriate to directly compare data on chest wall movements in children recorded using different measurement techniques. The best method of measurement varies with the clinical picture.
有几种技术可用于评估儿童胸壁运动,这些技术采用了不同的测量原理。尽管此类设备的输出看起来非常相似,但不同设备数据的可比性仍需评估。我们研究了在12名从重症监护中恢复的儿童中使用三种不同设备同时测量胸壁运动的情况。所使用的设备分别是感应式体积描记法(评估胸廓横截面积)、磁力计(评估胸廓直径)和霍尔装置应变仪(评估胸廓周长)。对这些患者的呼吸时间以及胸廓与腹部之间的相位角进行测量后发现,通气患者中不同设备之间的测量结果吻合度很高。然而,自主呼吸的患者偶尔会出现不一致的情况。我们认为,直接比较使用不同测量技术记录的儿童胸壁运动数据可能并不总是合适的。最佳测量方法会因临床情况而异。