Williams D M, Brown A M
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, England.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Feb;97(2):1130-40. doi: 10.1121/1.412226.
The amplitude of the 2f1-f2 distortion product was measured under four conditions in human subjects: during simple two-tone stimulation, during stimulation with a third, pure tone in the ipsilateral ear, during contralateral stimulation with broadband noise, and with combined ipsilateral third tone and contralateral noise. The amount of ipsilateral suppression produced varied with suppressor frequency but was maximum close to the f2 primary frequency as previously demonstrated using similar stimulus parameters [A. M. Brown and D. T. Kemp, Hear. Res. 13, 29-37 (1984); F. P. Harris, R. Probst, and L. Xu, ibid. 64, 133-141 (1992)]. Contralateral stimulation also suppressed the level of distortion. During ipsilateral suppression combined with contralateral stimulation, the amount of ipsilateral suppression of the distortion product was reduced. This interaction may indicate a common mechanism for ipsilateral and contralateral suppression. The decrease in ipsilateral suppression under contralateral stimulation was most pronounced at the peak of the ipsilateral suppression tuning curves and this produced some broadening of the function. In the majority of ipsilateral suppression curves, the peak ipsilateral suppression frequency was observed to shift upwards during contralateral stimulation. These results suggest that contralateral stimulation alters the frequency-selective properties of the cochlear response.
在人类受试者中,在四种条件下测量了2f1-f2畸变产物的幅度:在简单双音刺激期间、在同侧耳用第三个纯音刺激期间、在对侧用宽带噪声刺激期间,以及同侧第三个音和对侧噪声联合刺激期间。产生的同侧抑制量随抑制频率而变化,但如先前使用类似刺激参数所证明的那样,在接近f2基频处最大[A. M. 布朗和D. T. 肯普,《听觉研究》13,29 - 37(1984);F. P. 哈里斯、R. 普罗布斯特和L. 徐,同上,64,133 - 141(1992)]。对侧刺激也抑制了畸变水平。在同侧抑制与对侧刺激相结合时,畸变产物的同侧抑制量减少。这种相互作用可能表明同侧和对侧抑制存在共同机制。在对侧刺激下同侧抑制的减少在同侧抑制调谐曲线的峰值处最为明显,这导致了该功能的一些展宽。在大多数同侧抑制曲线中,观察到在对侧刺激期间同侧抑制峰值频率向上移动。这些结果表明,对侧刺激改变了耳蜗反应的频率选择性特性。