Egan T M, Thompson J T, Detterbeck F C, Lackner R P, Mill M R, Ogden W D, Aris R M, Paradowski L J
Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599.
Transplantation. 1995 Mar 15;59(5):707-13. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199503150-00012.
Current United Network for Organ Sharing policy requires listing lung transplant recipients with an acceptable donor weight range, but lung size is a function of height, age, sex, and race. Frequently, lung transplant recipients are underweight, which results in a large discrepancy between donor and recipient weights. We reviewed our experience with size discrepancy between donors (D) and recipients (R) of 49 double-lung transplant (DLTX) procedures since July 1990. Pneumoreduction procedures were performed in 11 recipients of lungs judged to be too large at the time of DLTX (right middle lobectomy, 2; lingulectomy, 2; both, 6; right middle lobectomy and bilateral apical resections, 1). Predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and total lung capacity (TLC) of donors and recipients were calculated. Donors were larger than recipients in general (D:R height = 1.02; D:R weight = 1.46), and, as a result, recipient-predicted lung volumes were smaller than donor-predicted lung volumes (D:R FVC = 1.1; D:R TLC = 1.1). Recipients undergoing pneumoreduction procedures had a significantly greater size discrepancy between donors and recipients; thus, both the ratio of D:R and the difference between D and R predicted FVC and TLC were significantly greater among recipients who underwent pneumoreduction, compared with nonreduced recipients. For recipients in the pneumoreduction group, predicted FVC and TLC were recalculated, with a proportionate amount subtracted based on the number of pulmonary segments removed. When the "corrected" FVC and TLC of the donors were compared with recipient-predicted FVC and TLC, there was no longer any significant difference between reduced and non-reduced groups, which implies that visual estimate of size mismatch at surgery is an accurate measure of size discrepancy. Post-DLTX spirometry showed identical improvement in FVC in patients who had pneumoreduction and those who did not, and survival at 6 months was identical in both groups. We conclude that pneumoreduction had no adverse effect on survival or post-DLTX spirometry, allowing safe use of larger donors in small recipients. Also, because lung size is more a function of height than weight, this study challenges the United Network for Organ Sharing practice of listing recipients with an acceptable donor weight range.
当前器官共享联合网络的政策要求列出具有可接受供体体重范围的肺移植受者,但肺的大小是身高、年龄、性别和种族的函数。肺移植受者通常体重过轻,这导致供体和受者体重之间存在很大差异。我们回顾了自1990年7月以来49例双肺移植(DLTX)手术中供体(D)和受者(R)之间大小差异的经验。11例DLTX时被判定肺过大的受者接受了减容手术(右中叶切除术2例;舌叶切除术2例;两者均做6例;右中叶切除术和双侧肺尖切除术1例)。计算了供体和受者的预计用力肺活量(FVC)和肺总量(TLC)。总体而言,供体比受者大(D:R身高 = 1.02;D:R体重 = 1.46),因此,受者预测的肺容积小于供体预测的肺容积(D:R FVC = 1.1;D:R TLC = 1.1)。接受减容手术的受者供体与受者之间的大小差异显著更大;因此,与未接受减容的受者相比,接受减容手术的受者中D:R比值以及D和R预测的FVC和TLC之间的差异均显著更大。对于减容组的受者,重新计算了预计FVC和TLC,并根据切除的肺段数量减去相应比例。当将供体的“校正后”FVC和TLC与受者预测的FVC和TLC进行比较时,减容组和未减容组之间不再有任何显著差异,这意味着手术时对大小不匹配的视觉估计是大小差异的准确衡量方法。DLTX术后肺活量测定显示,接受减容手术的患者和未接受减容手术的患者FVC改善相同,两组6个月时的生存率相同。我们得出结论,减容手术对生存率或DLTX术后肺活量测定没有不良影响,允许在小受者中安全使用更大的供体。此外,由于肺大小更多地是身高的函数而非体重的函数,本研究对器官共享联合网络列出具有可接受供体体重范围的受者的做法提出了挑战。