Suppr超能文献

六抗原匹配肾移植的单中心经验

A single-center experience with six-antigen-matched kidney transplants.

作者信息

Washburn W K, Shaffer D, Conway P, Madras P N, Monaco A P

机构信息

Division of Organ Transplantation, New England Deaconess Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1995 Mar;130(3):277-82. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430030047008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To review our center's experience with the United Network of Organ Sharing six-antigen-matched (6-AgM) kidney program. Specifically, to determine whether recipients of 6-AgM cadaver kidney transplants have less perioperative and short-term (< 1 year) morbidity in comparison with living-related donor (LRD) recipients and a control group of immunologically less well-matched cadaver recipients.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of all solitary kidney transplantations performed over a 24-month period, from 1992 to 1993.

SETTING

A large urban tertiary care referral center with a long history of renal and extrarenal transplantation.

PATIENTS

Adult patients receiving a solitary kidney transplant from either a cadaver or a living donor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, morbidity, and patient and graft survival. Other variables measured included rejection episodes, length of stay, readmissions, postoperative complications, waiting time, and delayed postoperative graft function.

RESULTS

Recipients of 6-AgM kidney transplants were at higher risk than the control groups of cadaver and LRD recipients, with more retransplantations, higher sensitization, and more with diabetes. There were fewer rejection episodes in the 6-AgM group, and these were more steroid responsive. They had fewer hospital days (22.6 days) in the first year following transplantation, compared with the remaining cadaver group (28 days). The delayed postoperative graft function rate was also significantly lower than that of the cadaver control group. Graft and patient survival were excellent for all groups. Analysis of these factors showed similar results when comparing the LRD and 6-AgM groups and a marked improvement over the cadaver control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Identical HLA matching for cadaver recipients provides superior results for graft and patient survival. There is much less perioperative morbidity in comparison with the less well-matched cadaver recipients. The effect of HLA matching is reflected in the perioperative courses of these patients, in addition to the long-term benefits of graft survival. Allograft survival is superior for this select group of cadaver recipients. The 6-AgM recipients behave similarly to LRD recipients in this cohort of patients. Our results would support the continued sharing of 6-AgM kidneys to optimize outcome and best use the limited resources available to the patients undergoing transplantation.

摘要

目的

回顾我们中心在器官共享联合网络(United Network of Organ Sharing)六抗原匹配(6-AgM)肾脏项目方面的经验。具体而言,确定与活体亲属供体(LRD)受者及免疫匹配程度较低的尸体供肾受者对照组相比,6-AgM尸体供肾移植受者围手术期及短期(<1年)发病率是否更低。

设计

对1992年至1993年24个月期间进行的所有单肾移植进行回顾性研究。

地点

一家具有肾脏及肾外移植悠久历史的大型城市三级医疗转诊中心。

患者

接受尸体或活体供体单肾移植的成年患者。

主要观察指标

死亡率、发病率以及患者和移植物存活率。测量的其他变量包括排斥反应发作次数、住院时间、再次入院情况、术后并发症、等待时间以及术后移植肾功能延迟恢复情况。

结果

6-AgM肾移植受者比尸体供肾和LRD受者对照组风险更高,再次移植更多、致敏性更高且糖尿病患者更多。6-AgM组排斥反应发作次数更少,且对类固醇更敏感。与其余尸体供肾组(28天)相比,他们移植后第一年的住院天数更少(22.6天)。术后移植肾功能延迟恢复率也显著低于尸体供肾对照组。所有组的移植物和患者存活率都很好。比较LRD组和6-AgM组时,对这些因素的分析显示结果相似,且明显优于尸体供肾对照组。

结论

尸体供肾受者的HLA完全匹配为移植物和患者存活提供了更好的结果。与匹配程度较低的尸体供肾受者相比,围手术期发病率要低得多。HLA匹配的影响不仅体现在这些患者的长期移植物存活益处上,还反映在围手术期过程中。对于这一特定组别的尸体供肾受者,同种异体移植物存活率更高。在这组患者中,6-AgM受者与LRD受者表现相似。我们的结果支持继续共享6-AgM肾脏,以优化结果并最佳利用移植患者可用的有限资源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验