Gouëllo J P, Victor J, Dupuis J M, Tadéi A
Service de Cardiologie, CHRU, Angers.
Presse Med. 1995 Feb 25;24(8):387-92.
To evaluate, on the basis of long-term outcome, the value of electrophysiologic exploration for determining the cause of syncope of unknown origin after clinical examination and standard laboratory tests.
In 1985 and 1986, 109 consecutive patients with syncope of unknown origin underwent electrophysiologic exploration. The patients were divided into two groups. Baseline electrocardiogram was abnormal in 59 patients: cardiopathy (32%), ischemia (17%). In 44 of these patients, electrophysiologic exploration revealed major abnormalities requiring treatment (Group 1). No aetiology could be defined in 65 patients (Group 2). Patients were followed for 37 +/- 11 months. Three were lost to follow-up and 106 were retained for analysis.
Morbidity and mortality were 25% and 16% respectively at the end of follow-up. Two sudden deaths were recorded, both in Group 1. Total mortality was greater in Group 1 (10 vs 6) so electrophysiologic exploration had defined a population at lower risk of sudden death and overall mortality. Relapse of syncope was observed in 27 patients (25% and 26% in Groups 1 and 2 respectively) due to rhythm disorders in 8, vasodepression in 1 and unknown origin in 18.
The rate of recurrent syncope suggests these patients should have a second work-up in order to diagnose initially false negatives. Relapse raises the problem of electrophysiologic abnormalities and multifactorial mechanisms causing syncope of unknown origin.
基于长期结果,评估在临床检查和标准实验室检查后,电生理检查对于确定不明原因晕厥病因的价值。
1985年和1986年,109例连续的不明原因晕厥患者接受了电生理检查。患者被分为两组。59例患者的基线心电图异常:心脏病(32%),缺血(17%)。在这些患者中,44例电生理检查显示有需要治疗的重大异常(第1组)。65例患者无法明确病因(第2组)。对患者进行了37±11个月的随访。3例失访,106例纳入分析。
随访结束时,发病率和死亡率分别为25%和16%。记录到2例猝死,均在第1组。第1组的总死亡率更高(10例对6例),因此电生理检查确定了猝死和总体死亡率风险较低的人群。27例患者出现晕厥复发(第1组和第2组分别为25%和26%),其中8例因节律紊乱,1例因血管迷走性晕厥,18例原因不明。
晕厥复发率提示这些患者应再次进行检查,以诊断最初的假阴性病例。复发引发了电生理异常和导致不明原因晕厥的多因素机制问题。