Green A, Steiner R, White N
Youngstown State University.
Brain Cogn. 1994 Jul;25(2):207-19. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1994.1031.
A dual-task follow-up investigation examined the influence of sample size and ideational complexity of cognitive tasks on lateralized effects. With a larger sample (n = 128), results showed a "manual dominance effect" for relaxed and paced nonideational vocalized tasks. A hierarchy of ideational verbal tasks yielded the expected lateralized effects which corresponded with increasingly greater interference in concurrent tapping, but not in strength of laterlized effect. Instead of a trend seen in the earlier work (Steiner, Green, & White, 1992), results revealed a significant difference between handedness groups for one complex spatial task. Finally, outcomes for the other spatial task highlight the importance of assessing tradeoffs in attention.
一项双任务随访调查研究了认知任务的样本量和概念复杂性对偏侧化效应的影响。在更大的样本量(n = 128)下,结果显示在放松和有节奏的非概念性发声任务中存在“手动优势效应”。一系列概念性言语任务产生了预期的偏侧化效应,这与同时进行的敲击任务中越来越大的干扰相对应,但与偏侧化效应的强度无关。与早期研究(施泰纳、格林和怀特,1992年)中观察到的趋势不同,在一项复杂的空间任务中,结果显示不同利手组之间存在显著差异。最后,另一项空间任务的结果突出了评估注意力权衡的重要性。