Jönsson B, Bebbington P E
Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 May;164(5):665-73. doi: 10.1192/bjp.164.5.665.
The purpose of this study was twofold: to measure the overall direct costs of depression for 1990 in the UK, and to develop a model to illustrate issues in the evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of the pharmacological treatment of depression. We compared a tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, with paroxetine, a newer antidepressant. For assessing the cost of illness, we used a top-down approach. We calculated direct but not indirect costs. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated by developing a simulation model based on the theory of clinical decision analysis to compare the costs and outcome of each treatment. From this we estimated the expected cost per patient and the cost per successfully treated patient. The total cost to the nation of depressive illness was estimated to be 222 pounds million. The expected costs per patient were found to be similar for paroxetine and imipramine (430 pounds v. 424 pounds). The costs per successfully treated patient were found to be lower for paroxetine (824 pounds) than for imipramine (1024 pounds). The results were stable when a sensitivity analysis was applied to the variables employed in the model. The most sensitive variable was the cost of treatment failure. Our model thus reveals that medication that appears expensive in terms of cost per day may not be so when patient compliance and the total costs of treatment are taken into account.
一是衡量1990年英国抑郁症的总体直接成本,二是建立一个模型来说明抑郁症药物治疗相对成本效益评估中的问题。我们将一种三环抗抑郁药丙咪嗪与一种较新的抗抑郁药帕罗西汀进行了比较。为评估疾病成本,我们采用了自上而下的方法。我们计算了直接成本而非间接成本。通过基于临床决策分析理论开发一个模拟模型来比较每种治疗的成本和结果,从而评估成本效益。据此我们估算了每位患者的预期成本以及每位成功治疗患者的成本。据估计,抑郁症给国家带来的总成本为2.22亿英镑。结果发现,帕罗西汀和丙咪嗪每位患者的预期成本相似(分别为430英镑和424英镑)。帕罗西汀每位成功治疗患者的成本(824英镑)低于丙咪嗪(1024英镑)。当对模型中使用的变量进行敏感性分析时,结果是稳定的。最敏感的变量是治疗失败的成本。因此,我们的模型表明,就每日成本而言看似昂贵的药物,若将患者依从性和治疗总成本考虑在内,可能并非如此。