Zhang J, Herman E H, Ferrans V J
Division of Research and Testing, Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD 20708.
Toxicology. 1994 Sep 6;92(1-3):179-92. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(94)90176-7.
An evaluation was made of the protective effects of ICRF-186 [(L)1,2-bis(3,5-dioxopiperazinyl-l-yl)propane], the L-enantiomer of ICRF-187 [(D)1,2-bis(3,5-dioxopiperazinyl-l-yl)propane], against the cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity induced in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) by doxorubicin. SHR were given doxorubicin (1 mg/kg, i.v.), once a week for 12 weeks. Group 1 (n = 10) received doxorubicin alone; Groups 2, 3 and 4 (each, n = 5) received ICRF-186, 25 mg/kg (group 2), 12.5 mg/kg (group 3) or 6.25 mg/kg (group 4), i.p., 30 min before each dose of doxorubicin. Two groups of control animals (each, n = 5) received 12 weekly i.p. injections of saline or 25 mg/kg ICRF-186. ICRF-186 provided significant protection, in a dose-dependent manner, against the cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity of doxorubicin and attenuated the increases in cardiac immune effector cells (interstitial dendritic cells, cytotoxic T-helper lymphocytes and macrophages) associated with this cardiotoxicity. The results of the study were compared with those obtained with ICRF-187 under identical experimental conditions. Analysis of the cardiomyopathy scores, nephropathy scores and counts of the numbers of immune effector cells in the heart showed that, at a dose of 25 mg/kg, ICRF-186 is a somewhat less effective protectant than ICRF-187. At a dose of 12.5 mg/kg, both compounds induced generally similar degrees of protection. At a dose of 6.25 mg/kg, both had comparable, but only minimal, protective effects.
对ICRF-186[(L)1,2-双(3,5-二氧代哌嗪基-1-基)丙烷],即ICRF-187[(D)1,2-双(3,5-二氧代哌嗪基-1-基)丙烷]的L-对映体,针对阿霉素诱发的自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)的心脏毒性和肾毒性的保护作用进行了评估。给SHR静脉注射阿霉素(1mg/kg),每周1次,共12周。第1组(n = 10)仅接受阿霉素;第2、3和4组(每组n = 5)在每次注射阿霉素前30分钟腹腔注射ICRF-186,剂量分别为25mg/kg(第2组)、12.5mg/kg(第3组)或6.25mg/kg(第4组)。两组对照动物(每组n = 5)每周腹腔注射12次生理盐水或25mg/kg ICRF-186。ICRF-186以剂量依赖方式对阿霉素的心脏毒性和肾毒性提供了显著保护,并减弱了与此心脏毒性相关的心脏免疫效应细胞(间质树突状细胞、细胞毒性辅助性T淋巴细胞和巨噬细胞)的增加。在相同实验条件下,将该研究结果与用ICRF-187获得的结果进行了比较。对心肌病评分、肾病评分以及心脏中免疫效应细胞数量的分析表明,在25mg/kg剂量下,ICRF-186作为保护剂的效果略逊于ICRF-187。在12.5mg/kg剂量下,两种化合物诱导的保护程度大致相似。在6.25mg/kg剂量下,两者具有相当但仅为最小的保护作用。