Oberle J W, Rath S A, Richter H P
Abteilung Neurochirurgie, Universität Ulm im Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg.
Zentralbl Neurochir. 1994;55(2):102-9.
Many attempts have been made in the past to find predictive factors concerning patients operated on because of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. The factors most frequently discussed in the literature are the patient's age, the importance of the preoperative neurological deficit, the duration of symptoms, accompanying diseases as diabetes mellitus or alcoholism and preoperative electrophysiological findings (EMG and conduction velocity measurements). With the exception of the electrophysiological findings, which uniformly are considered to be without predictive value, all other factors mentioned above are discussed controversly. In 1972 Kline and Nulsen [12] have shown, that intraoperatively evoked nerve action potentials across a traumatic nerve lesion can provide information about nerve regeneration. This information helps to choose the appropriate surgical procedure namely either neurolysis or neuroma resection and grafting. However there are no reports dealing with this method in nerve entrapment syndromes. We present the results of 17 patients with ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. They were operated on in our hospital between 1989 and 1992 by simple decompression or by anterior transposition of the nerve. In each of them we tried to record electrically evoked nerve action potentials intraoperatively and compared preoperative clinical findings with the potentials recorded. Our main interest was to find out, if the potentials have any predictive value regarding the clinical outcome. In 16 of 17 patients we were able to record a reproducable nerve action potential. Amplitudes varied between 3.4 and 140 uV. Conduction velocities of the fastest fibers ranged from 17 to 71 m/s, while potential duration varied between 1.3 to more than 8 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
过去曾多次尝试寻找与因肘部尺神经卡压而接受手术的患者相关的预测因素。文献中最常讨论的因素包括患者年龄、术前神经功能缺损的严重程度、症状持续时间、伴随疾病如糖尿病或酗酒以及术前电生理检查结果(肌电图和传导速度测量)。除了被一致认为没有预测价值的电生理检查结果外,上述所有其他因素都存在争议。1972年,克莱恩和努尔森[12]表明,术中通过外伤性神经损伤诱发的神经动作电位可以提供有关神经再生的信息。这些信息有助于选择合适的手术方法,即神经松解术或神经瘤切除术及移植术。然而,尚无关于该方法在神经卡压综合征中的报道。我们展示了17例肘部尺神经卡压患者的结果。1989年至1992年间,他们在我院接受了单纯减压或神经前移手术。我们在每例患者术中尝试记录电诱发神经动作电位,并将术前临床检查结果与记录的电位进行比较。我们主要想弄清楚这些电位对临床结果是否有任何预测价值。17例患者中有16例能够记录到可重复的神经动作电位。波幅在3.4至140微伏之间。最快纤维的传导速度在17至71米/秒之间,而电位持续时间在1.3至8毫秒以上。(摘要截取自250字)