Suppr超能文献

定向冠状动脉斑块旋切术治疗稳定型和不稳定型心绞痛的急性和长期结果

Acute and long-term outcome of directional coronary atherectomy for stable and unstable angina.

作者信息

Umans V A, de Feyter P J, Deckers J W, MacLeod D, van den Brand M, de Jaegere P, Serruys P W

机构信息

Catheterization Laboratory, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1994 Oct 1;74(7):641-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90302-6.

Abstract

The clinical efficacy and safety of directional coronary atherectomy for the treatment of stable and unstable angina were assessed in 82 patients with stable and 68 patients with unstable angina. Therefore, clinical and angiographic follow-up was obtained in a prospectively collected consecutive series of 150 atherectomy procedures. Restenosis was assessed clinically and by quantitative angiography. The overall clinical success rate of atherectomy for patients with unstable and stable angina was 88% and 91%, respectively. No significant differences were found for in-hospital event rates between the unstable and stable angina groups: death (1.5% vs 0%), myocardial infarction (10% vs 6%), and emergency bypass operation (3% vs 2%). These clinical events were related to the occurrence of abrupt occlusions (8.8% in patients with stable and 6.1% in those with unstable angina; p = NS). Clinical follow-up was achieved in 100% of the patients with stable and unstable angina at a mean interval of 923 and 903 days, respectively. Two-year survival rates were 96% and 97% in the populations with unstable and stable angina, respectively. There were no significant differences with respect to bypass surgery and angioplasty, but event-free survival at 2 years was significantly lower in the unstable (54%) than the stable (69%) angina group. Quantitative coronary angiography did not detect any difference in luminal renarrowing during the 6-month angiographic follow-up period. Although directional coronary atherectomy can be performed effectively in patients with unstable and stable angina, the long-term clinical outcome was less favorable in the unstable angina group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在82例稳定型心绞痛患者和68例不稳定型心绞痛患者中评估了定向冠状动脉斑块旋切术治疗稳定型和不稳定型心绞痛的临床疗效及安全性。因此,对前瞻性收集的连续150例斑块旋切术进行了临床和血管造影随访。通过临床评估和定量血管造影评估再狭窄情况。不稳定型和稳定型心绞痛患者斑块旋切术的总体临床成功率分别为88%和91%。不稳定型和稳定型心绞痛组的院内事件发生率无显著差异:死亡(1.5%对0%)、心肌梗死(10%对6%)和急诊搭桥手术(3%对2%)。这些临床事件与急性闭塞的发生有关(稳定型心绞痛患者中为8.8%,不稳定型心绞痛患者中为6.1%;p=无显著性差异)。稳定型和不稳定型心绞痛患者的临床随访率均达到100%,平均随访间隔分别为923天和903天。不稳定型和稳定型心绞痛人群的两年生存率分别为96%和97%。在搭桥手术和血管成形术方面无显著差异,但不稳定型心绞痛组(54%)的2年无事件生存率显著低于稳定型心绞痛组(69%)。定量冠状动脉造影未发现6个月血管造影随访期间管腔再狭窄有任何差异。尽管定向冠状动脉斑块旋切术可有效应用于不稳定型和稳定型心绞痛患者,但不稳定型心绞痛组的长期临床结局较差。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验