Hirshberg A, Wall M J, Allen M K, Mattox K L
Cora and Webb Mading Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.
Am J Surg. 1994 Oct;168(4):299-303. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80152-7.
Missed injuries have a bad reputation and are sometimes associated with serious morbidity for the patient and personal embarrassment for the surgeon. During a 10-year period, 123 missed injuries in 117 patients requiring re-operation were encountered in one trauma center. A retrospective review of causes and patterns was undertaken. The most common presentation was delayed hemorrhage (64 injuries). The colon, thoracic vasculature, chest wall arteries, and diaphragm were the most frequently involved sites. Forty-six injuries were overlooked during the diagnostic work-up, and 43 were missed during surgery. Technical problems with diagnosis and surgery accounted for 62% of missed injuries, whereas decision and judgment errors accounted for the rest. Further insight was provided by the classification of missed injuries into three types. Type I (20%) occurred outside the body area of clinical focus, whereas type II (69%) occurred within it. Type III (11%) resulted when instability of the patient necessitated interruption of the diagnostic work-up or exploration. Each type represents a different clinical pattern and dictates a specific preventive strategy.
漏诊损伤声名不佳,有时会给患者带来严重的发病率问题,也会让外科医生感到个人尴尬。在一个创伤中心的10年期间,117例需要再次手术的患者中出现了123例漏诊损伤。对其原因和模式进行了回顾性分析。最常见的表现是延迟出血(64例损伤)。结肠、胸段血管、胸壁动脉和膈肌是最常受累的部位。46例损伤在诊断检查过程中被漏诊,43例在手术过程中被漏诊。诊断和手术的技术问题占漏诊损伤的62%,其余则是决策和判断错误所致。将漏诊损伤分为三种类型,这提供了进一步的见解。I型(20%)发生在临床关注的身体区域之外,而II型(69%)发生在该区域内。III型(11%)是由于患者的不稳定需要中断诊断检查或探查所致。每种类型代表不同的临床模式,并决定了特定的预防策略。