Knauf H, Mutschler E
Medizinische Klinik I, St.-Bernward-Krankenhaus, Hildesheim, Germany.
Cardiology. 1994;84 Suppl 2:87-98. doi: 10.1159/000176461.
In a prospective randomized short-term study, the efficacy and safety of xipamide and a combination of spironolactone and furosemide were compared in the treatment of hepatic cirrhotic ascites. Twenty-two patients were randomized to either xipamide, 20 mg/day (group I), or spironolactone, 200 mg/day, combined with furosemide, 40 mg on alternate days (group II). During the first 4 days of treatment, adequate diuresis, measured as loss of body weight greater than 1.6 kg, occurred in 7 patients in group I and in 3 in group II. In the latter group, another 4 patients responded satisfactorily after a further 4 days of treatment. Four patients in group I who failed to respond to xipamide with an adequate loss of body weight were subsequently treated with the spironolactone-furosemide combination, but only one responded. Two patients in group II who failed to respond to the combination of spironolactone and furosemide also failed to respond to xipamide. In both groups, a positive diuretic response occurred only when the pretreatment fractional sodium excretion exceeded 0.2%. Diuretic resistance was overcome only by additional treatments which reduced proximal tubular sodium reabsorption. Xipamide commonly induced hypokalaemia; in contrast hyperkalaemia was seen following treatment with the spironolactone-furosemide combination. Renal function remained stable in all patients during both diuretic treatments. An open ongoing 6-month trial of torasemide, 10-40 mg/day, in combination with spironolactone, 50-400 mg/day, has also been undertaken in 117 patients with cirrhotic ascites who showed inadequate responses to salt and water restriction and spironolactone alone. Twenty-seven patients have been withdrawn from the study, 9 for the complications of hepatic coma, bleeding oesophageal varices, or hyponatraemia. Twenty-two patients are still being treated and 68 have completed the trial on a mean dose of torasemide, 15 mg/day. Body weight was reduced by a mean of 2.3 kg at 6 weeks, 2.6 kg at 14 weeks and 3.2 kg after 6 months. Loss of body weight was primarily associated with reduction of ascites and secondarily with reduction of peripheral oedema. There were no untoward adverse reactions with torasemide, and no significant changes in serum electrolytes, liver, renal, or haematological variables.
在一项前瞻性随机短期研究中,比较了氯噻嗪与螺内酯和呋塞米联合用药治疗肝硬化腹水的疗效和安全性。22例患者被随机分为两组,一组服用氯噻嗪,每日20mg(第一组);另一组服用螺内酯,每日200mg,联合隔日服用呋塞米40mg(第二组)。在治疗的前4天,第一组有7例患者、第二组有3例患者出现了足够的利尿效果,即体重减轻超过1.6kg。在第二组中,另外4例患者在进一步治疗4天后反应良好。第一组中4例对氯噻嗪治疗后体重未出现足够减轻的患者,随后接受了螺内酯-呋塞米联合治疗,但只有1例有反应。第二组中2例对螺内酯和呋塞米联合治疗无反应的患者,对氯噻嗪也无反应。两组中,只有当治疗前的钠排泄分数超过0.2%时才会出现阳性利尿反应。只有通过减少近端肾小管钠重吸收的额外治疗才能克服利尿抵抗。氯噻嗪常引起低钾血症;相比之下,螺内酯-呋塞米联合治疗后出现高钾血症。在两种利尿治疗期间,所有患者的肾功能均保持稳定。还对117例对限盐限水及单独使用螺内酯反应不佳的肝硬化腹水患者进行了一项为期6个月的开放试验,使用托拉塞米,每日10 - 40mg,联合螺内酯,每日50 - 400mg。27例患者退出研究,9例因肝昏迷、食管静脉曲张出血或低钠血症等并发症退出。22例患者仍在接受治疗,68例患者已完成试验,托拉塞米的平均剂量为每日15mg。6周时体重平均减轻2.3kg,14周时减轻2.6kg,6个月后减轻3.2kg。体重减轻主要与腹水减少有关,其次与外周水肿减轻有关。托拉塞米未出现不良不良反应,血清电解质、肝脏、肾脏或血液学指标也无显著变化。