• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院外使用沙丁胺醇吸入治疗对患者舒适度和发病率的影响。

Effect of out-of-hospital albuterol inhalation treatments on patient comfort and morbidity.

作者信息

Weiss S J, Anand P, Ernst A A, Orgeron D, May W L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Nov;24(5):873-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70205-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70205-5
PMID:7978560
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of the institution of out-of-hospital albuterol treatments for acute asthma on out-of-hospital time intervals emergency department (ED) morbidity.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart and ambulance run report review.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients who presented with a diagnosis of asthma on the ED record and ambulance run report during 1988 and 1990.

RESULTS

Ninety patients treated prior to the routine use of nebulized albuterol (in 1988) and 86 patients treated during the period after the institution of nebulized albuterol (in 1990) were compared. Age, sex, scene and travel times, vital signs, peak expiratory flow rates, length of ED stay, hospitalizations, ED treatment, and mortality were recorded for each patient. Changes over time were determined using a cohort of asthma patients in each year as controls. Severity was recorded as low (less than 3) or high (3 or more) on a modified Fischl index for asthma. Groups were compared by F test, chi 2, or t test with P < .05 considered significant. Because there were differences for admission rates, first-hospital peak expiratory flow rates, and aminophylline use in control groups, the experimental groups could not be compared. No significant difference in travel interval, steroid use, albuterol treatments, or length of ED stay was determined in either the experimental or control group. Scene time (9.7 minutes versus 12.1 minutes) was significantly shorter in 1988 than in 1990 (difference, 2.4 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 4.6; P < .01). The percentage of patients with high initial severity of disease (85% versus 66%; P < .001) and the percentage of patients with first posttreatment peak expiratory flow rates of less than 120 L/min (77% versus 58%; P < .001) were significantly higher in 1988 than in 1990. There was no significant difference in scene time, severity scores, or first posttreatment peak expiratory flow rates in control groups.

CONCLUSION

The institution of out-of-hospital use of nebulized albuterol increased scene time and increased first posttreatment peak expiratory flow rates significantly. There was a significant decrease in initial patient severity as measured on the modified Fischl index, although the validity of this index has not been established. It did not affect travel interval, length of stay in the ED, or medication use after ED presentation.

摘要

研究目的

确定院外使用沙丁胺醇治疗急性哮喘对院外时间间隔及急诊科发病率的影响。

设计

回顾性病历及救护车出诊报告审查。

研究对象

1988年至1990年期间在急诊科病历和救护车出诊报告中诊断为哮喘的所有患者。

结果

比较了1988年在常规使用雾化沙丁胺醇之前治疗的90例患者和1990年开始使用雾化沙丁胺醇之后治疗的86例患者。记录了每位患者的年龄、性别、现场及转运时间、生命体征、呼气峰值流速、急诊科停留时间、住院情况、急诊科治疗及死亡率。每年以一组哮喘患者作为对照来确定随时间的变化。根据改良的费施尔哮喘指数将严重程度记录为低(小于3)或高(3或更高)。采用F检验、卡方检验或t检验对组间进行比较,P <.05被认为具有统计学意义。由于对照组在入院率、首次入院时呼气峰值流速及氨茶碱使用方面存在差异,因此无法对实验组进行比较。在实验组或对照组中,转运间隔、类固醇使用、沙丁胺醇治疗或急诊科停留时间均未发现显著差异。1988年的现场时间(9.7分钟对12.1分钟)明显短于1990年(差值为2.4分钟;95%置信区间为0.2至4.6;P <.01)。1988年初始疾病严重程度高的患者百分比(85%对6%;P <.001)及首次治疗后呼气峰值流速低于120 L/分钟的患者百分比(77%对58%;P <.001)均显著高于1990年。对照组在现场时间、严重程度评分或首次治疗后呼气峰值流速方面无显著差异。

结论

院外使用雾化沙丁胺醇增加了现场时间,并显著提高了首次治疗后呼气峰值流速。根据改良的费施尔指数测量,初始患者严重程度显著降低,尽管该指数的有效性尚未得到证实。它并未影响转运间隔、在急诊科的停留时间或在急诊科就诊后的药物使用情况。

相似文献

1
Effect of out-of-hospital albuterol inhalation treatments on patient comfort and morbidity.院外使用沙丁胺醇吸入治疗对患者舒适度和发病率的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Nov;24(5):873-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70205-5.
2
Comparison of intermittent and continuously nebulized albuterol for treatment of asthma in an urban emergency department.
Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Dec;22(12):1842-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80411-1.
3
Effect of continuously nebulized ipratropium bromide plus albuterol on emergency department length of stay and hospital admission rates in patients with acute bronchospasm. A randomized, controlled trial.持续雾化吸入异丙托溴铵加沙丁胺醇对急性支气管痉挛患者急诊科留观时间及住院率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Chest. 1999 Apr;115(4):937-44. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.4.937.
4
A comparison of albuterol administered by metered-dose inhaler and spacer with albuterol by nebulizer in adults presenting to an urban emergency department with acute asthma.在城市急诊科就诊的急性哮喘成年患者中,定量气雾剂加储雾罐吸入沙丁胺醇与雾化吸入沙丁胺醇的比较。
Chest. 2002 Apr;121(4):1036-41. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.4.1036.
5
Nebulized versus intravenous albuterol in hypercapnic acute asthma. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Jun;149(6):1466-70. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.6.8004299.
6
Emergency treatment of acute asthma with albuterol metered-dose inhaler plus holding chamber: how often should treatments be administered?使用沙丁胺醇定量吸入器加储物罐对急性哮喘进行急救治疗:治疗应多久进行一次?
Chest. 1997 Aug;112(2):348-56. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.2.348.
7
A randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of continuous nebulized albuterol (15 mg) versus continuous nebulized albuterol (15 mg) plus ipratropium bromide (2 mg) for the treatment of acute asthma.一项随机临床试验,比较持续雾化吸入沙丁胺醇(15毫克)与持续雾化吸入沙丁胺醇(15毫克)加异丙托溴铵(2毫克)治疗急性哮喘的疗效。
J Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;31(4):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.05.025.
8
Metered-dose inhalers with spacers vs nebulizers for pediatric asthma.带储雾罐的定量吸入器与雾化器治疗小儿哮喘的比较
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Feb;149(2):201-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170140083015.
9
Improving efficiency of pediatric emergency asthma treatment by using metered dose inhaler.使用定量吸入器提高小儿急诊哮喘治疗的效率。
J Asthma. 2019 Oct;56(10):1079-1086. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1514629. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Treatment of acute severe asthma with inhaled albuterol delivered via jet nebulizer, metered dose inhaler with spacer, or dry powder.使用喷射雾化器、带储雾罐的定量吸入器或干粉吸入器吸入沙丁胺醇治疗急性重症哮喘。
Chest. 1997 Jul;112(1):24-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.24.

引用本文的文献

1
Singapore First Aid Guidelines 2021.新加坡急救指南 2021 年版。
Singapore Med J. 2021 Aug;62(8):427-432. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021112.
2
Adult Patients with Respiratory Distress: Current Evidence-based Recommendations for Prehospital Care.成人呼吸窘迫患者:当前基于证据的院前护理推荐。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 25;21(4):849-857. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.2.43896.
3
Guidelines for Bystander First Aid 2016.《2016年旁观者急救指南》
Singapore Med J. 2017 Jul;58(7):411-417. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017062.
4
Emergency pre-hospital management of patients admitted with acute asthma.急性哮喘入院患者的院前急救管理
Thorax. 2000 Feb;55(2):97-101. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.2.97.