Suppr超能文献

院外使用沙丁胺醇吸入治疗对患者舒适度和发病率的影响。

Effect of out-of-hospital albuterol inhalation treatments on patient comfort and morbidity.

作者信息

Weiss S J, Anand P, Ernst A A, Orgeron D, May W L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Nov;24(5):873-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70205-5.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of the institution of out-of-hospital albuterol treatments for acute asthma on out-of-hospital time intervals emergency department (ED) morbidity.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart and ambulance run report review.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients who presented with a diagnosis of asthma on the ED record and ambulance run report during 1988 and 1990.

RESULTS

Ninety patients treated prior to the routine use of nebulized albuterol (in 1988) and 86 patients treated during the period after the institution of nebulized albuterol (in 1990) were compared. Age, sex, scene and travel times, vital signs, peak expiratory flow rates, length of ED stay, hospitalizations, ED treatment, and mortality were recorded for each patient. Changes over time were determined using a cohort of asthma patients in each year as controls. Severity was recorded as low (less than 3) or high (3 or more) on a modified Fischl index for asthma. Groups were compared by F test, chi 2, or t test with P < .05 considered significant. Because there were differences for admission rates, first-hospital peak expiratory flow rates, and aminophylline use in control groups, the experimental groups could not be compared. No significant difference in travel interval, steroid use, albuterol treatments, or length of ED stay was determined in either the experimental or control group. Scene time (9.7 minutes versus 12.1 minutes) was significantly shorter in 1988 than in 1990 (difference, 2.4 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 4.6; P < .01). The percentage of patients with high initial severity of disease (85% versus 66%; P < .001) and the percentage of patients with first posttreatment peak expiratory flow rates of less than 120 L/min (77% versus 58%; P < .001) were significantly higher in 1988 than in 1990. There was no significant difference in scene time, severity scores, or first posttreatment peak expiratory flow rates in control groups.

CONCLUSION

The institution of out-of-hospital use of nebulized albuterol increased scene time and increased first posttreatment peak expiratory flow rates significantly. There was a significant decrease in initial patient severity as measured on the modified Fischl index, although the validity of this index has not been established. It did not affect travel interval, length of stay in the ED, or medication use after ED presentation.

摘要

研究目的

确定院外使用沙丁胺醇治疗急性哮喘对院外时间间隔及急诊科发病率的影响。

设计

回顾性病历及救护车出诊报告审查。

研究对象

1988年至1990年期间在急诊科病历和救护车出诊报告中诊断为哮喘的所有患者。

结果

比较了1988年在常规使用雾化沙丁胺醇之前治疗的90例患者和1990年开始使用雾化沙丁胺醇之后治疗的86例患者。记录了每位患者的年龄、性别、现场及转运时间、生命体征、呼气峰值流速、急诊科停留时间、住院情况、急诊科治疗及死亡率。每年以一组哮喘患者作为对照来确定随时间的变化。根据改良的费施尔哮喘指数将严重程度记录为低(小于3)或高(3或更高)。采用F检验、卡方检验或t检验对组间进行比较,P <.05被认为具有统计学意义。由于对照组在入院率、首次入院时呼气峰值流速及氨茶碱使用方面存在差异,因此无法对实验组进行比较。在实验组或对照组中,转运间隔、类固醇使用、沙丁胺醇治疗或急诊科停留时间均未发现显著差异。1988年的现场时间(9.7分钟对12.1分钟)明显短于1990年(差值为2.4分钟;95%置信区间为0.2至4.6;P <.01)。1988年初始疾病严重程度高的患者百分比(85%对6%;P <.001)及首次治疗后呼气峰值流速低于120 L/分钟的患者百分比(77%对58%;P <.001)均显著高于1990年。对照组在现场时间、严重程度评分或首次治疗后呼气峰值流速方面无显著差异。

结论

院外使用雾化沙丁胺醇增加了现场时间,并显著提高了首次治疗后呼气峰值流速。根据改良的费施尔指数测量,初始患者严重程度显著降低,尽管该指数的有效性尚未得到证实。它并未影响转运间隔、在急诊科的停留时间或在急诊科就诊后的药物使用情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验