Gudmundsson M, Oden A, Bjelle A
Department of Rheumatology, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gøteborg, Sweden.
Biorheology. 1994 Jul-Aug;31(4):407-16. doi: 10.3233/bir-1994-31409.
Different methods of measuring whole blood viscosity using a couette rotational viscometer were compared to establish its use in clinical rheumatological practice. The relationship between blood viscosity and hematocrit was approximately exponential and no significant differences in the slopes were found between healthy controls and rheumatoid arthritis patients. Correction of native blood viscosity to a standard hematocrit of 40% by extrapolation from a standard regression curve, established by concentration/dilution of samples from healthy persons to correct for hematocrit differences and at shear rate 92s-1, was the best method for differentiating between viscosities of patients and controls. It was also the least laborious method, requiring the smallest amounts of blood and having the lowest method error. Native blood viscosity, corrected blood viscosity, plasma viscosity and red cell aggregation were all significantly higher and hematocrit significantly lower in rheumatoid arthritis patients than in controls.
比较了使用库埃特旋转粘度计测量全血粘度的不同方法,以确定其在临床风湿病实践中的应用。血液粘度与血细胞比容之间的关系近似呈指数关系,在健康对照组和类风湿关节炎患者之间未发现斜率有显著差异。通过从标准回归曲线外推,将天然血液粘度校正到40%的标准血细胞比容,该标准回归曲线是通过对健康人的样本进行浓缩/稀释以校正血细胞比容差异,并在剪切速率92s-1下建立的,这是区分患者和对照组粘度的最佳方法。它也是最省力的方法,所需血量最少,方法误差最低。类风湿关节炎患者的天然血液粘度、校正血液粘度、血浆粘度和红细胞聚集均显著高于对照组,而血细胞比容则显著低于对照组。