Liberman J, Stewart W, Seines O, Gordon B
Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, MD 21205.
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Jul;50(4):615-24. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<615::aid-jclp2270500419>3.0.co;2-r.
This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, and Delayed Recall, respectively. However, statistically significant mean differences in score were found between raters on the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed Recall. Though the majority of structural units within the RCF are reliably scored, several units had a greater magnitude of observed scoring differences compared to the other units after adjusting for expected differences. Overall, reliability estimates demonstrate high intrarater reliability and acceptable interrater reliability except for the potential for systematic scoring differences.
本报告评估了对雷-奥斯特里思复杂图形测试(RCF)进行定量评分时的评分者内信度和评分者间信度。复制、即时回忆和延迟回忆的评分者内相关系数分别为0.96、0.99和0.96,评分者间相关系数分别为0.88、0.97和0.96。然而,在复制、即时回忆和延迟回忆方面,评分者之间的得分存在统计学上的显著平均差异。尽管RCF中的大多数结构单元评分可靠,但在调整预期差异后,与其他单元相比,有几个单元观察到的评分差异幅度更大。总体而言,可靠性估计表明,除了存在系统评分差异的可能性外,评分者内信度较高,评分者间信度可接受。