Doria A, Piccoli A, Vesco P, Vaccaro E, Marson P, De Silvestro G, Ossi E, Gambari P
Division of Rheumatology, University of Padova, Italy.
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1994;145(5):307-11.
The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of 3 different therapeutic protocols in the treatment of patients with WHO class IV lupus nephritis and normal renal function. We carried out a randomized prospective trial. The treatment programs consisted of a standard therapy regimen alone (protocol A), plus plasmapheresis (protocol B) or pulse methylprednisolone (protocol C), followed by a slow (protocols A and B) or fast (protocol C) prednisone tapering schedule. Statistical analysis was performed, using univariate survival analysis according to Kaplan Meier and Breslow's test to compare survival curves. Eighteen patients entered the study: 6 protocol A, 5 protocol B and 7 protocol C. No patients developed renal insufficiency. Moreover, no statistical differences in the probability of inducing partial or complete disease remission and in reducing 24-hour urinary protein excretion to < or = 2 g per day were observed among the groups. Protocols A and B were more effective in comparison with protocol C in decreasing 24-hour urinary protein excretion to < or = 0.5 g and < or = 0.2 g per day. In conclusion, a slow prednisone tapering schedule is more effective in reducing 24-hour urinary protein excretion to < or = 0.5 and < or = 0.2 g per day as compared with a fast prednisone tapering schedule, even if it is preceded by methylprednisolone pulse therapy.
我们研究的目的是比较3种不同治疗方案对世界卫生组织(WHO)IV级狼疮性肾炎且肾功能正常患者的治疗效果。我们进行了一项随机前瞻性试验。治疗方案包括单纯标准治疗方案(方案A)、加血浆置换(方案B)或甲泼尼龙冲击治疗(方案C),随后采用缓慢(方案A和B)或快速(方案C)的泼尼松减量方案。采用根据Kaplan Meier法的单变量生存分析和Breslow检验进行统计分析,以比较生存曲线。18名患者进入研究:6名采用方案A,5名采用方案B,7名采用方案C。没有患者出现肾功能不全。此外,各治疗组在诱导部分或完全疾病缓解的概率以及将24小时尿蛋白排泄量降至≤2 g/天方面,未观察到统计学差异。在将24小时尿蛋白排泄量降至≤0.5 g/天和≤0.2 g/天方面,与方案C相比,方案A和B更有效。总之,与快速泼尼松减量方案相比,缓慢泼尼松减量方案在将24小时尿蛋白排泄量降至≤0.5 g/天和≤0.2 g/天方面更有效,即使在甲泼尼龙冲击治疗之后。