Suppr超能文献

不同程度左心室收缩功能障碍的慢性重度心力衰竭病例的患者特征

Patient characteristics in cases of chronic severe heart failure with different degrees of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

作者信息

Eriksson S V, Kjekshus J, Offstad J, Swedberg K

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Cardiology. 1994;85(3-4):137-44. doi: 10.1159/000176668.

Abstract

It has not been determined previously whether patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure differ in demographic characteristics with respect to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVD). In patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure in NYHA IV, an optional protocol in the CONSENSUS-I trial was designed to ascertain whether there were any differences in patient characteristics regarding the degree of LVD defined as left ventricular fractional shortening (FS). A subgroup of 54 patients from the CONSENSUS-I trial were evaluated with M-mode echocardiography. Patients with FS above median (14%) were older (74 +/- 7 vs. 68 +/- 7, p < 0.01), more often female (48 vs. 15%, p < 0.05) and had lower heart rates (77 +/- 15 vs. 95 +/- 17, p < 0.01). Analysis of the 2-year follow-up from the end of the trial was also performed. In the placebo group, patients with FS > 14% had significantly better prognosis than patients with FS < 14%. In the enalapril-treated group no such difference in survival was seen. The difference between the original treatment groups remained, despite the fact that treatment with enalapril was then made available to all surviving patients. In conclusion, patients with advanced chronic congestive heart failure and less severe LVD have different demographic characteristics than patients with more severe LVD. In the placebo group, but not in the enalapril group, prognosis was better in patients with less severe LVD.

摘要

此前尚未确定重度慢性充血性心力衰竭患者在人口统计学特征方面是否因左心室收缩功能障碍(LVD)而有所不同。在纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能IV级的重度慢性充血性心力衰竭患者中,“CONSENSUS - I试验”设计了一个可选方案,以确定在以左心室缩短分数(FS)定义的LVD程度方面,患者特征是否存在差异。对“CONSENSUS - I试验”中的54名患者亚组进行了M型超声心动图评估。FS高于中位数(14%)的患者年龄更大(74±7岁对68±7岁,p<0.01),女性比例更高(48%对15%,p<0.05),心率更低(77±15次/分对95±17次/分,p<0.01)。还对试验结束后的2年随访情况进行了分析。在安慰剂组中,FS>14%的患者预后明显好于FS<14%的患者。在依那普利治疗组中,未观察到生存方面的此类差异。尽管后来所有存活患者都接受了依那普利治疗,但原始治疗组之间的差异仍然存在。总之,晚期慢性充血性心力衰竭且LVD较轻的患者与LVD较重的患者在人口统计学特征上有所不同。在安慰剂组而非依那普利组中,LVD较轻的患者预后更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验