Snyder P J, Weinrich J D, Pillard R C
Neuropsychology Department, Allegheny Neuropsychiatric Institute, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Oakdale 15071.
Arch Sex Behav. 1994 Aug;23(4):433-51. doi: 10.1007/BF01541408.
Self-identified homosexual (n = 30), bisexual (n = 29), and heterosexual (n = 31) men were compared on measures of gender-typical behavior, sex role, ego strength, and lipid levels. Homosexual men differed significantly from the heterosexual men on the gender-typical behavior and feminine sex-role measure (both in adulthood and in childhood), and several trends and significant differences were found on the biochemical measures of lipid levels (especially when 7 obese men were removed from the analyses). As a rule, the bisexual men were different from the heterosexual men on the above measures, but were indistinguishable from the homosexual men. Bisexuals differed from both of the other two groups, however, by scoring lower on the ego strength scale and by reporting themselves to be more often troubled, lonely, and depressed. We caution that the lipid analyses were made on single blood samples and require an extended replication; however, we report the data because of their possible theoretical interest and because they replicate work of 20 years ago.
对自我认定的同性恋男性（n = 30）、双性恋男性（n = 29）和异性恋男性（n = 31）在性别典型行为、性别角色、自我强度和血脂水平等方面进行了比较。同性恋男性在性别典型行为和女性化性别角色测量方面（包括成年期和儿童期）与异性恋男性有显著差异，并且在血脂水平的生化测量方面发现了一些趋势和显著差异（特别是在将7名肥胖男性排除在分析之外时）。通常，双性恋男性在上述测量方面与异性恋男性不同，但与同性恋男性没有区别。然而，双性恋者与其他两组的不同之处在于，他们在自我强度量表上得分较低，并且报告自己更经常感到困扰、孤独和沮丧。我们提醒，血脂分析是基于单次血样进行的，需要进一步重复验证；然而，我们报告这些数据是因为它们可能具有理论意义，并且它们重复了20年前的研究结果。
