Murray R A, Essick G K, Kelly D G
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7455.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Jul;52(7):688-97. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90480-4.
Clinicians have used the same instrument (viz, Semmes-Weinstein pressure aesthesiometers [Research Design, Inc, Houston, TX] or "von Frey hairs") for tests of both contact detection and direction discrimination. However, patients' ability to discriminate direction may be underestimated by barely detectable moving stimuli. To determine whether the aesthesiometers underestimate direction discrimination, we evaluated the capacity of 13 normal subjects to distinguish opposing directions provided by 10 different hairs. The hairs were selected to deliver forces below and above the contact-detection threshold. Each was stroked over 1.0 cm of perioral skin at the velocity at which the subject was predicted to best discriminate direction of motion. It was found that valid estimates of perioral direction discrimination can be obtained with appropriately selected aesthesiometers. Specifically, the least stiff hair whose handle displays a manufacturer's marking two units greater than that of the contact-detection "threshold hair" should be used to deliver the moving stimuli. The resultant force applied by this hair will exceed 10 times the subject's contact-detection threshold force. If a less-stiff hair is used, the capacity to distinguish direction may be underestimated.
临床医生使用相同的器械(即Semmes-Weinstein压力觉测量仪[研究设计公司,休斯顿,德克萨斯州]或“von Frey毛发”)进行接触检测和方向辨别测试。然而,勉强可检测到的移动刺激可能会低估患者辨别方向的能力。为了确定压力觉测量仪是否低估了方向辨别能力,我们评估了13名正常受试者区分10种不同毛发所提供的相反方向的能力。这些毛发被选择用于施加低于和高于接触检测阈值的力。每根毛发以预计受试者能最佳辨别运动方向的速度在口周皮肤1.0厘米的范围内进行划动。结果发现,使用适当选择的压力觉测量仪可以获得对口周方向辨别的有效估计。具体而言,应使用手柄上制造商标记比接触检测“阈值毛发”大两个单位的最不硬的毛发来施加移动刺激。该毛发施加的合力将超过受试者接触检测阈值力的10倍。如果使用较不硬的毛发,辨别方向的能力可能会被低估。