Brissette L, Falstrault L
Département des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Jun 23;1213(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(94)90215-1.
We have recently shown by the analysis of the association to HepG2 cells of human intermediate density lipoproteins (IDL) either labeled in cholesteryl ester (CE) with [3H]cholesteryl ethers (CEt) or in proteins by iodine-125 that the CE of IDL are selectively taken up by these cells. Our results also revealed that the addition of a sufficient quantity of HDL3 abolishes the binding of IDL to the 'Lipoprotein binding site' (LBS) and also the CE-selective uptake. This suggested that the LBS mediates this uptake (Brissette and Falstrault (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1165, 84-92). This study was undertaken to analyze further the mechanism of the selective uptake of the CE of IDL by HepG2 cells to determine if the LBS is directly or indirectly involved. We show that the different labeling had no effect on the binding affinity of IDL to HepG2 cells. To verify that the apolipoprotein moiety of HDL3 was responsible for the abolishment of the CE selective uptake, we have studied the effect of free apoA-I and apoA-II on the association of IDL. Our results demonstrate that apoA-I and apoA-II are approximately 10-times better than HDL3 or apoA-I liposomes in abolishing the selective uptake of the CE from IDL. We also show that this correlates with a more efficient reduction of the binding of 125I-IDL to HepG2 cells by free apoA-I compared to apoA-I associated with lipids. Thus free apoA-I interfere with the binding of IDL to the LBS and free apolipoproteins have a better capacity to saturate the LBS than lipoproteins. Also, we found no evidence for the transfer of CE from the labeled IDL to HDL3 or to apolipoproteins used to abolish the interaction of IDL to the LBS. Thus our results indicate that the LBS is directly responsible for the selective uptake of CE.
我们最近通过分析用[3H]胆固醇醚(CEt)标记胆固醇酯(CE)或用碘-125标记蛋白质的人中间密度脂蛋白(IDL)与HepG2细胞的结合情况表明,IDL的CE被这些细胞选择性摄取。我们的结果还显示,添加足量的HDL3可消除IDL与“脂蛋白结合位点”(LBS)的结合以及CE的选择性摄取。这表明LBS介导了这种摄取(Brissette和Falstrault,1992年,《生物化学与生物物理学报》1165卷,84 - 92页)。本研究旨在进一步分析HepG2细胞选择性摄取IDL的CE的机制,以确定LBS是直接还是间接参与其中。我们发现不同的标记对IDL与HepG2细胞的结合亲和力没有影响。为了验证HDL3的载脂蛋白部分是否是消除CE选择性摄取的原因,我们研究了游离载脂蛋白A-I和载脂蛋白A-II对IDL结合的影响。我们的结果表明,在消除IDL中CE的选择性摄取方面,载脂蛋白A-I和载脂蛋白A-II比HDL3或载脂蛋白A-I脂质体大约强10倍。我们还表明,这与游离载脂蛋白A-I相比与脂质结合的载脂蛋白A-I更有效地减少125I-IDL与HepG2细胞的结合相关。因此,游离载脂蛋白A-I干扰IDL与LBS的结合,并且游离载脂蛋白比脂蛋白具有更好的饱和LBS的能力。此外,我们没有发现标记的IDL中的CE转移到用于消除IDL与LBS相互作用的HDL3或载脂蛋白的证据。因此,我们的结果表明LBS直接负责CE的选择性摄取。