Hagisawa S, Ferguson-Pell M, Cardi M, Miller S D
Center for Rehabilitation Technology, Helen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw, NY 10993-1195.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1994;31(1):1-14.
This study was undertaken to determine whether the reactive hyperemia response following ischemia in spinal cord injured (SCI) individuals is different from that which occurs in able-bodied (AB) individuals. The reactive hyperemia response was produced by applying a pressure of 150 mmHg for 300 s, 600 s, and 900 s to the skin over the greater trochanter in 10 SCI and 10 AB subjects using a computer-controlled pneumatic indentation system. The changes in blood content and oxygenation in the superficial vessels of the skin, associated with indentation, were monitored using reflectance spectrophotometry. A brief pressure of 80 mmHg, to simulate finger pressing (blanching), was applied to the same site to detect changes in reflow behavior during the hyperemic period. The results indicate that the reactive hyperemia response in SCI group was not substantially different from AB group although the reflow rate after load release was slower in the SCI group compared with the AB group.
本研究旨在确定脊髓损伤(SCI)个体缺血后的反应性充血反应是否与健全(AB)个体不同。使用计算机控制的气动压痕系统,对10名脊髓损伤受试者和10名健全受试者的大转子上方皮肤施加150 mmHg的压力,持续300秒、600秒和900秒,以产生反应性充血反应。使用反射分光光度法监测与压痕相关的皮肤浅表血管中血液含量和氧合的变化。在同一部位施加80 mmHg的短暂压力以模拟手指按压(变白),以检测充血期的再灌注行为变化。结果表明,SCI组的反应性充血反应与AB组没有实质性差异,尽管SCI组负荷释放后的再灌注率比AB组慢。