Chen Y B, Chen H C, Hahn L H
Department of Surgery and Dentistry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Republic of China.
Microsurgery. 1994;15(4):227-37. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920150403.
Free vascularized bones have been shown by many specialists to exhibit specific capabilities of reconstructing a major mandibular defect and can solve problems that may be insoluble by other methods. Nevertheless, absolute indications for using vascularized bone for major mandibular reconstructions have not been sufficiently well delineated to convince people of always considering vascularized bone for major mandibular reconstructions as a first option. Based on our experience with 55 major mandibular reconstructions, we might delineate the absolute indications for using free vascularized bone for major mandibular reconstructions explicitly: 1) osteoradionecrosis of mandible or on irradiated tissue bed; 2) hemimandibular reconstruction with a free end facing the glenoid fossa; 3) long segment mandibular defect, especially across the symphysis; 4) inadequate skin or mucosal lining; 5) defects demanding sandwich reconstruction; 6) inability to obtain secure immobilization on the reconstructed unit; 7) failure of reconstruction by other methods; 8) near total mandibular reconstruction. Selection of donor tissue should be according to 1) the amount of tissue deficiencies, 2) composition of the defect, 3) design and placement of the flap, 4) irradiation on the recipient site or not, 5) which vessels to be used, 6) which flap has the appropriate vessel length 7) skin color and texture of the donor tissue, 8) how many osteotomies required to stimulate the curvature of the resected mandible 9) speed of bony union, 10) feasibility of future osseointegration. We have used three kinds of vascularized bones (iliac bone, fibula, scapula). Iliac bone was most frequently used, and has always been our first choice, since it can carry good quality bone, a large skin flap, and ample soft tissue. The fibula has the merit of being less bulky and good for simultaneous intraoral lining, but the contour is more rigid and the bony height is insufficient. The scapula bone is rarely used at present because of its relative inconvenience.
许多专家已证实,带血管游离骨在重建下颌骨大面积缺损方面具有特定能力,能够解决其他方法可能无法解决的问题。然而,对于在下颌骨大面积重建中使用带血管骨的绝对适应证,尚未有足够明确的界定,难以让人们始终将带血管骨用于下颌骨大面积重建作为首选。基于我们对55例下颌骨大面积重建的经验,我们可以明确地界定在下颌骨大面积重建中使用带血管游离骨的绝对适应证:1)下颌骨放射性骨坏死或在受照射组织床上;2)游离端朝向关节窝的半侧下颌骨重建;3)长节段下颌骨缺损,尤其是跨越颏部的缺损;4)皮肤或黏膜衬里不足;5)需要三明治式重建的缺损;6)在重建部位无法获得可靠固定;7)其他方法重建失败;8)近乎全下颌骨重建。供体组织的选择应依据:1)组织缺损量;2)缺损的构成;3)皮瓣的设计与放置;4)受区是否接受过照射;5)使用哪些血管;6)哪种皮瓣具有合适的血管长度;7)供体组织的肤色和质地;8)为顺应切除下颌骨的曲度需要进行多少处截骨;9)骨愈合速度;10)未来骨整合的可行性。我们使用了三种带血管骨(髂骨、腓骨、肩胛骨)。髂骨使用最为频繁,一直是我们的首选,因为它能携带优质骨、一大块皮瓣和充足的软组织。腓骨的优点是体积较小,利于同时进行口内衬里,但外形较僵硬,骨高度不足。肩胛骨目前很少使用,因为相对不便。