Ohman A, Soares J J
Department of Clinical Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1994 May;103(2):231-40. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.103.2.231.
We tested the hypothesis that an unconscious preattentive perceptual analysis of phobic stimuli is sufficient to elicit human fear responses. Selected snake- and spider-fearful Ss, as well as normal controls, were exposed to pictures of snakes, spiders, flowers, and mushrooms. A separate forced-choice recognition experiment established backward masking conditions that effectively precluded recognition of experimental stimuli both for fearful and nonfearful Ss. In the main experiment, these conditions were used to compare skin conductance responses (SCRs) to masked and nonmasked phobic and control pictures among fearful and nonfearful Ss. In support of the hypotheses, snake- and spider-fearful Ss showed elevated SCRs to snake and spider pictures as compared with neutral pictures and with responses of the nonfearful Ss under both masking conditions. Ratings of valence, arousal, and dominance indicated that the fearful Ss felt more negative, more aroused, and less dominant in relation to both masked and nonmasked phobic stimuli.
对恐惧刺激进行无意识的前注意知觉分析足以引发人类的恐惧反应。选择了对蛇和蜘蛛恐惧的受试者以及正常对照组,让他们观看蛇、蜘蛛、花和蘑菇的图片。另一个迫选识别实验建立了反向掩蔽条件,有效地排除了恐惧和非恐惧受试者对实验刺激的识别。在主要实验中,利用这些条件比较了恐惧和非恐惧受试者对掩蔽和未掩蔽的恐惧及对照图片的皮肤电导率反应(SCR)。为支持这些假设,与中性图片以及两种掩蔽条件下非恐惧受试者的反应相比,对蛇和蜘蛛恐惧的受试者对蛇和蜘蛛图片的SCR升高。效价、唤醒和支配性评分表明,恐惧受试者对掩蔽和未掩蔽的恐惧刺激都感觉更消极、更兴奋且支配性更低。