Schmidt P P
Exceptional Child and Infant Vision Testing Laboratory, College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Optom Vis Sci. 1994 Apr;71(4):273-81. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199404000-00008.
The usefulness of the Random Dot E (RDE) stereotest in screening the vision of school-aged children for vision problems has been established. As a single screening procedure, the effectivity (phi) of the RDE (phi = +0.52) is greater than the widely used Snellen acuity technique (phi = +0.36) and faster to complete. Very-low-birthweight (VLBW) children have a higher incidence of vision problems including strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive error than children born with normal-birthweights (NBW's). My purpose was to determine: (1) whether a group of young children at high risk for vision problems could perform random dot stereotesting and (2) an age appropriate pass/fail criterion for stereoacuity screening. Furthermore, categorization as pass or fail by each screening method studied [stereoacuity (RDE), visual acuity [Teller Acuity Cards (TAC) and Broken Wheel (BWA)] and refractive error] was compared for independent agreement with vision examination results. The subjects were a cohort of NBW and VLBW) (< 1500 g) children matched at birth for maternal age, ethnic origin, time of hospital birth, and parity. Results of a masked investigation of 30 children [VLBW (N = 10) and NBW (N = 20) children] tested at 3 years of age (mean age = 3.0 years, range 2.11 to 3.1 years) showed that (1) 86.7% were able to complete the 168 sec arc random dot stereoacuity task when a two-alternative forced-choice preferential-looking paradigm was used for testing, (2) the specificity and sensitivity were 88.2%, 76.9% (RDE); 81.2%, 64.3% (TAC); 52.9%, 92.3% (BWA); and 94.1%, 61.5% (refractive error), respectively, (3) the reliability the RDE stereoacuity screening was greater (k = +0.66) than any of the other procedures studied, and (4) there was 73.3% agreement on test-retest categorizations between observers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
随机点E(RDE)立体视测试在筛查学龄儿童视力问题方面的效用已得到证实。作为一种单一的筛查程序,RDE的有效性(phi = +0.52)高于广泛使用的斯内伦视力检查技术(phi = +0.36),且完成速度更快。极低出生体重(VLBW)儿童出现斜视、弱视和屈光不正等视力问题的发生率高于正常出生体重(NBW)儿童。我的目的是确定:(1)一组有视力问题高风险的幼儿是否能够进行随机点立体视测试,以及(2)适合年龄的立体视锐度筛查通过/失败标准。此外,还比较了所研究的每种筛查方法(立体视锐度[RDE]、视力[Teller视力卡(TAC)和破轮(BWA)]以及屈光不正)的通过或失败分类与视力检查结果的独立一致性。研究对象是一组NBW和VLBW(<1500克)儿童,他们在出生时按母亲年龄、种族、医院出生时间和产次进行匹配。对30名儿童[VLBW(N = 10)和NBW(N = 20)儿童]在3岁时(平均年龄 = 3.0岁,范围2.11至3.1岁)进行的一项盲法调查结果显示:(1)当使用二选一强制选择优先注视范式进行测试时,86.7%的儿童能够完成168秒弧度的随机点立体视锐度任务;(2)特异性和敏感性分别为88.2%、76.9%(RDE);81.2%、64.3%(TAC);52.9%、92.3%(BWA);以及94.1%、61.5%(屈光不正);(3)RDE立体视锐度筛查的可靠性(k = +0.66)高于所研究的任何其他程序;(4)观察者之间的重测分类一致性为73.3%。(摘要截短于250字)