Hopkins H A, Looney W B, Carter W H, Reto D C, Campbell E D
Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22901.
In Vivo. 1994 Jan-Feb;8(1):97-105.
Endpoints available for comparison of two or more treatment arms in a clinical cancer trial include response rates (complete and partial), time to progression, and patient survival. In experimental systems, similar endpoints are available (tumor cell survival, tumor regrowth, tumor cure rates, and host survival), but there is opportunity for more precise measurements and a wider range for varying the independent variables. Radiotherapy alone was compared with an alternating schedule in which both radiotherapy and cyclophosphamide (CP) were given intermittently for a total of 3 courses of each. Radiotherapy was given as multiple, 250 cGy fractions per day (MFD) in 2-day courses. Cyclophosphamide alone (3 x 150 mg/kg) was equivalent in tumor effect to 3600 cGy of irradiation given with the MFD schedule. The experimental points for the combined modality treatments fell along the lower edge of the zone of additivity. Exprapolation of the plots of log surviving fraction vs. total radiation for the combined treatment predicted a 37% cure rate at 6000 cGy + CP. There was a high probability for long term control and tumor cures only with the highest total doses of radiation (6000, 7000 and 8000 cGy) when combined with CP. The results obtained in well defined experimental tumor models provide quantitative information of the interrelationship of the major determinants on end results of the effectiveness of treatment and acceptable host toxicity of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The quantitative evaluation of these major determinants on treatment outcome in relationship to host toxicity is often difficult or impossible to obtain in clinical host toxicity is often difficult or impossible to obtain in clinical studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在临床癌症试验中,可用于比较两个或更多治疗组的终点指标包括缓解率(完全缓解和部分缓解)、疾病进展时间和患者生存率。在实验系统中,也有类似的终点指标(肿瘤细胞存活、肿瘤再生长、肿瘤治愈率和宿主生存率),但有机会进行更精确的测量,并且在改变自变量方面有更广泛的范围。单独放疗与交替方案进行了比较,在交替方案中,放疗和环磷酰胺(CP)均间歇性给药,各共3个疗程。放疗采用每日多次、每次250 cGy分次(MFD),为期2天的疗程。单独使用环磷酰胺(3×150 mg/kg)在肿瘤效应上等同于采用MFD方案给予的3600 cGy照射。联合治疗方式的实验点落在相加区的下边缘。联合治疗的对数存活分数与总辐射量的关系图外推预测,在6000 cGy + CP时治愈率为37%。只有当与CP联合使用最高总剂量的辐射(6000、7000和8000 cGy)时,才有高概率实现长期控制和肿瘤治愈。在定义明确的实验肿瘤模型中获得的结果提供了关于联合化疗和放疗有效性的最终结果以及可接受的宿主毒性的主要决定因素之间相互关系的定量信息。在临床研究中,通常很难或不可能获得这些主要决定因素对治疗结果与宿主毒性关系的定量评估。(摘要截短至250字)