Beck J C
Cambridge Court Clinic, MA 02141.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(4):453-63.
The author describes his experience as an expert in evaluating defendants convicted of capital murder. He reviews the Supreme Court decisions and provisions of state law that have led defense attorneys to obtain psychiatric evaluations of their clients. Three illustrative cases are presented, one of an incompetent grossly impaired defendant, one of a defendant for whom the finding of mental health played a role in over turning his conviction, and one for a defendant who was later found to be retarded and therefore not executable. The clinical and social implications of psychiatric participation in these cases are discussed.
作者描述了他作为评估被判死刑谋杀罪被告的专家的经历。他回顾了最高法院的判决以及州法律条款,这些促使辩护律师为其客户进行精神病学评估。文中呈现了三个说明性案例,一个是无行为能力且严重受损的被告案例,一个是心理健康评估结果在推翻其定罪过程中起作用的被告案例,还有一个是后来被认定为智力迟钝因而不可执行死刑的被告案例。文中还讨论了精神病学参与这些案例所带来的临床和社会影响。