Schito G C, Nicoletti G
Institute of Microbiology, University of Genoa, Italy.
J Chemother. 1994 Apr;6(2):92-8. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1994.11741135.
A survey aimed at assessing the ability of ceftibuten, a new oral third-generation cephalosporin, to eradicate in vitro selected bacterial pathogens was conducted in 1991 in 17 microbiology laboratories evenly distributed in Italy. Over 8700 organisms collected from in- and outpatients affected mainly by respiratory and urinary tract infections were analyzed. This collection of bacteria did not include staphylococci, enterococci, Pseudomonas and other oxidative species naturally refractory to the action of most antibiotics employed. Susceptibility to ceftibuten, cefaclor, cefuroxime, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cotrimoxazole and erythromycin was assessed using a standardized agar-diffusion method. Production of beta-lactamases was confirmed by the nitrocefin test. Among the microorganisms studied E. coli (32.1%) prevailed, followed by P. mirabilis (17.1%), K. pneumoniae (10.9%), S. pyogenes (6.6%), E. cloacae (5.1%), Serratia spp. (4.5%), Enterobacter spp. (4.2%), H. influenzae (3.6%), S. pneumoniae (2.2%) and M. catarrhalis (2%). Within this group of pathogens amoxicillin resistance, often mediated by synthesis of beta-lactamases, was widely diffused (46.2%). The overall inhibitory activity of the drugs tested decreased as follows: ceftibuten (90.4%), cefuroxime (80.4%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (77.4%), cotrimoxazole (75.3%), cefaclor (72.6%), amoxicillin (53.8%) and erythromycin (32.8%). When the efficacy of the antibiotics was assessed against the collection of respiratory isolates producing beta-lactamases only ceftibuten maintained the same overall potency manifested against the general population while the comparative agents were far less effective. The results of this national survey indicate that, given the low incidence of resistance among the most prevalent causative agents of respiratory and urinary tract infections, ceftibuten can be safely used at present in the empiric therapy of these conditions especially when they occur in community settings.
1991年,在意大利均匀分布的17个微生物实验室开展了一项调查,旨在评估新型口服第三代头孢菌素头孢布烯在体外清除选定细菌病原体的能力。对从主要患有呼吸道和泌尿道感染的门诊和住院患者身上采集的8700多种微生物进行了分析。该细菌样本不包括葡萄球菌、肠球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和其他对大多数所用抗生素天然耐药的氧化型细菌。采用标准化琼脂扩散法评估对头孢布烯、头孢克洛、头孢呋辛、阿莫西林、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、复方新诺明和红霉素的敏感性。通过硝基头孢菌素试验确认β-内酰胺酶的产生。在所研究的微生物中,大肠杆菌(32.1%)占比最高,其次是奇异变形杆菌(17.1%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(10.9%)、化脓性链球菌(6.6%)、阴沟肠杆菌(5.1%)、沙雷氏菌属(4.5%)、肠杆菌属(4.2%)、流感嗜血杆菌(3.6%)、肺炎链球菌(2.2%)和卡他莫拉菌(2%)。在这组病原体中,通常由β-内酰胺酶合成介导的阿莫西林耐药性广泛存在(46.2%)。所测试药物的总体抑制活性如下降低:头孢布烯(90.4%)、头孢呋辛(80.4%)、阿莫西林-克拉维酸(77.4%)、复方新诺明(75.3%)、头孢克洛(72.6%)、阿莫西林(53.8%)和红霉素(32.8%)。当针对仅产生β-内酰胺酶的呼吸道分离菌样本评估抗生素疗效时,只有头孢布烯保持了对总体样本显示出的相同总体效力,而对比药物的效果则差得多。这项全国性调查结果表明,鉴于呼吸道和泌尿道感染最常见病原体的耐药发生率较低,目前头孢布烯可安全用于这些疾病的经验性治疗,尤其是在社区环境中发生这些疾病时。