• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年的基因检测。由谁来决定?

Genetic testing for children and adolescents. Who decides?

作者信息

Wertz D C, Fanos J H, Reilly P R

机构信息

Shriver Center for Mental Retardation, Waltham, MA 02254.

出版信息

JAMA. 1994 Sep 21;272(11):875-81.

PMID:8078166
Abstract

In the future there is likely to be a large array of DNA-based tests to diagnose single-gene disorders and to identify predispositions to genetically influenced disorders. This article focuses on ethical, legal, and psychological implications of testing healthy children and adolescents for such disorders. Testing may offer medical or psychological benefits but may harm parent-child bonds or the child's self-concept. Clinicians may encounter situations where they must weigh the child's or adolescent's wishes against wishes of parents. We examine the legal history and current status of minors as health care consumers; psychosocial research on their maturity to make choices; impact of testing on intrafamilial relationships; views of national commissions on appropriate ages of assent and full informed consent; ethical and legal requirements for competence in children and adolescents; and disclosure of genetic information. We propose guidelines for predictive genetic testing and counseling of children and discuss risks and benefits of testing.

摘要

未来可能会出现大量基于DNA的检测方法,用于诊断单基因疾病以及识别受遗传影响疾病的易感性。本文重点关注对健康儿童和青少年进行此类疾病检测所涉及的伦理、法律和心理影响。检测可能带来医学或心理益处,但也可能损害亲子关系或孩子的自我概念。临床医生可能会遇到必须权衡儿童或青少年的意愿与父母意愿的情况。我们研究了未成年人作为医疗消费者的法律历史和现状;关于他们做出选择的成熟度的社会心理研究;检测对家庭内部关系的影响;国家委员会对适当的同意年龄和完全知情同意的看法;儿童和青少年能力的伦理和法律要求;以及遗传信息的披露。我们提出了儿童预测性基因检测和咨询的指导方针,并讨论了检测的风险和益处。

相似文献

1
Genetic testing for children and adolescents. Who decides?儿童和青少年的基因检测。由谁来决定?
JAMA. 1994 Sep 21;272(11):875-81.
2
Testing children for genetic predispositions: is it in their best interest?
J Law Med Ethics. 1995 Winter;23(4):331-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1995.tb01375.x.
3
Ethical issues in pediatric life-threatening illness: dilemmas of consent, assent, and communication.儿童危及生命疾病中的伦理问题:同意、赞同与沟通的困境
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(1):43-57. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0701_4.
4
The family rule: a framework for obtaining ethical consent for medical interventions from children.家庭规则:从儿童那里获得医疗干预伦理同意的框架。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):491-6; discussion 497-500. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.491.
5
Minors' assent, consent, or dissent to medical research.未成年人对医学研究的同意、赞成或反对。
IRB. 1993 Mar-Apr;15(2):1-7.
6
Testing healthy children and adolescents: recommendations for avoiding harm.对健康儿童和青少年进行检测:避免伤害的建议。
Genetic Resour. 1994;8(2):16-20.
7
Health care treatment decision-making guidelines for minors.未成年人医疗保健治疗决策指南。
Bioethics Forum. 1995 Winter;11(4):A1-16.
8
Respecting the health care decision-making capacity of minors.尊重未成年人的医疗保健决策能力。
Bioethics Forum. 1995 Winter;11(4):7-12.
9
Genetic testing of children for adult-onset diseases: is testing in the child's best interests?对儿童进行成人期发病疾病的基因检测:检测是否符合儿童的最大利益?
Mt Sinai J Med. 2006 May;73(3):605-8.
10
Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP).儿童的知情同意/同意。欧洲儿科专家联合会(CESP)伦理工作组声明。
Eur J Pediatr. 2003 Sep;162(9):629-33. doi: 10.1007/s00431-003-1193-z. Epub 2003 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The full spectrum of ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a systematic qualitative review.儿科全基因组测序中的伦理问题全景:系统定性综述。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02830-w.
2
Identifying the challenges to successfully teaching about genetic diversity among Japanese junior high school students.识别在日本初中生中成功开展关于遗传多样性教学所面临的挑战。
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Sep 20;8:2050312120960656. doi: 10.1177/2050312120960656. eCollection 2020.
3
Discouraging Elective Genetic Testing of Minors: A Norm under Siege in a New Era of Genomic Medicine.
劝阻对未成年人进行选择性基因检测:在基因组医学新时代受到冲击的规范。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020 May 1;10(5):a036657. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036657.
4
Genomic Essentialism: Its Provenance and Trajectory as an Anticipatory Ethical Concern.基因组本质主义:其作为一种预期性伦理关切的起源与发展轨迹。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 May;49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10-S18. doi: 10.1002/hast.1012.
5
The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition.青春期对父母关于遗传性癌症易感性检测及讨论观点的影响
J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0267-z.
6
Predictive Genetic Testing of Children for Adult-Onset Conditions: Negotiating Requests with Parents.对儿童进行成人发病疾病的预测性基因检测:与家长协商检测请求
J Genet Couns. 2017 Apr;26(2):244-250. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0018-y. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
Genetic Testing and Neuroimaging: Trading off Benefit and Risk for Youth with Mental Illness.基因检测与神经影像学:权衡患有精神疾病的青少年的益处与风险
Ann Psychiatry Ment Health. 2014;2(2). Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
The psychological impact of genetic information on children: a systematic review.基因信息对儿童的心理影响:一项系统综述。
Genet Med. 2016 Aug;18(8):755-62. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.181. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Potential Uses and Inherent Challenges of Using Genome-Scale Sequencing to Augment Current Newborn Screening.使用基因组规模测序增强当前新生儿筛查的潜在用途及内在挑战
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015 Oct 5;5(12):a023150. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a023150.
10
Genetic Counseling for Fragile X Syndrome: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.脆性X综合征的遗传咨询:美国国家遗传咨询师协会的建议
J Genet Couns. 2000 Aug;9(4):303-25. doi: 10.1023/A:1009454112907.