Suppr超能文献

双重对比钡灌肠和乙状结肠镜检查在憩室病患者息肉检测中的准确性。

Accuracy of double contrast barium enema and sigmoideoscopy in the detection of polyps in patients with diverticulosis.

作者信息

Stefánsson T, Bergman A, Ekbom A, Nyman R, Påhlman L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 1994 Sep;35(5):442-6.

PMID:8086250
Abstract

The sensitivity between double contrast barium enema (DCBE) and sigmoideoscopy in diagnosing neoplastic lesions in the sigmoid colon was compared in patients with diverticulosis. In 52 patients with severe diverticulosis (> or = 15 diverticulas) the DCBE detected one out of 4 polyps found by sigmoideoscopy. In the remaining 54 patients with mild diverticulosis (< 15 diverticulas) DCBE detected 7 out of 10 polyps found by sigmoideoscopy. Successful bowel preparation did not influence the outcome of the DCBE. Sigmoideoscopy was incomplete in 17 (16%) of the patients; females were more difficult to examine than males (p = 0.012), as were those with a previous pelvic operation (p = 0.032). We conclude that neither DCBE nor sigmoideoscopy alone is sufficient to detect all neoplastic lesions in the sigmoid colon in patients with sigmoid diverticulosis of the colon.

摘要

在患有憩室病的患者中,比较了双重对比钡灌肠(DCBE)和乙状结肠镜检查在诊断乙状结肠肿瘤性病变方面的敏感性。在52例严重憩室病(憩室≥15个)患者中,DCBE检测出乙状结肠镜检查发现的4个息肉中的1个。在其余54例轻度憩室病(憩室<15个)患者中,DCBE检测出乙状结肠镜检查发现的10个息肉中的7个。成功的肠道准备并未影响DCBE的结果。17例(16%)患者的乙状结肠镜检查不完全;女性比男性更难检查(p = 0.012),有既往盆腔手术史的患者也是如此(p = 0.032)。我们得出结论,对于患有结肠乙状结肠憩室病的患者,单独使用DCBE或乙状结肠镜检查都不足以检测出乙状结肠中的所有肿瘤性病变。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验