Suppr超能文献

双重对比钡灌肠和乙状结肠镜检查在憩室病患者息肉检测中的准确性。

Accuracy of double contrast barium enema and sigmoideoscopy in the detection of polyps in patients with diverticulosis.

作者信息

Stefánsson T, Bergman A, Ekbom A, Nyman R, Påhlman L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 1994 Sep;35(5):442-6.

PMID:8086250
Abstract

The sensitivity between double contrast barium enema (DCBE) and sigmoideoscopy in diagnosing neoplastic lesions in the sigmoid colon was compared in patients with diverticulosis. In 52 patients with severe diverticulosis (> or = 15 diverticulas) the DCBE detected one out of 4 polyps found by sigmoideoscopy. In the remaining 54 patients with mild diverticulosis (< 15 diverticulas) DCBE detected 7 out of 10 polyps found by sigmoideoscopy. Successful bowel preparation did not influence the outcome of the DCBE. Sigmoideoscopy was incomplete in 17 (16%) of the patients; females were more difficult to examine than males (p = 0.012), as were those with a previous pelvic operation (p = 0.032). We conclude that neither DCBE nor sigmoideoscopy alone is sufficient to detect all neoplastic lesions in the sigmoid colon in patients with sigmoid diverticulosis of the colon.

摘要

在患有憩室病的患者中,比较了双重对比钡灌肠(DCBE)和乙状结肠镜检查在诊断乙状结肠肿瘤性病变方面的敏感性。在52例严重憩室病(憩室≥15个)患者中,DCBE检测出乙状结肠镜检查发现的4个息肉中的1个。在其余54例轻度憩室病(憩室<15个)患者中,DCBE检测出乙状结肠镜检查发现的10个息肉中的7个。成功的肠道准备并未影响DCBE的结果。17例(16%)患者的乙状结肠镜检查不完全;女性比男性更难检查(p = 0.012),有既往盆腔手术史的患者也是如此(p = 0.032)。我们得出结论,对于患有结肠乙状结肠憩室病的患者,单独使用DCBE或乙状结肠镜检查都不足以检测出乙状结肠中的所有肿瘤性病变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验