Bielack S S, Bieling P, Erttmann R, Winkler K
Cancer Treat Res. 1993;62:85-92. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3518-8_12.
The use of multiagent chemotherapy has led to improved survival for osteosarcoma patients. Infusion of cisplatin by the intraarterial route in order to devitalize the primary tumor more effectively has been advocated in this context. While systemic drug levels do not seem to be compromised by this regional approach, the envisioned increase in platinum content of osteosarcoma tissue has not been substantiated. As far as clinical results are concerned, neither a comparison of various protocols including cisplatin by either intraarterial or intravenous application, nor the only controlled study dealing with the subject (COSS 86), were able to demonstrate a correlation between the route of cisplatin administration and tumor response to chemotherapy. Therefore, the use of the intraarterial route for cisplatin treatment of osteosarcoma cannot be considered standard therapy but is still an investigational approach without proven benefits. In addition, the risk of side effects and the increased cost of this procedure should be considered before deciding to use intraarterial treatment for osteosarcoma.
多药联合化疗的应用提高了骨肉瘤患者的生存率。在这种情况下,有人主张通过动脉内途径输注顺铂,以便更有效地使原发肿瘤失活。虽然这种局部给药方法似乎不会影响全身药物水平,但骨肉瘤组织中铂含量预期的增加尚未得到证实。就临床结果而言,无论是比较包括通过动脉内或静脉内应用顺铂的各种方案,还是唯一一项关于该主题的对照研究(COSS 86),都未能证明顺铂给药途径与肿瘤对化疗的反应之间存在相关性。因此,动脉内途径用于顺铂治疗骨肉瘤不能被视为标准疗法,仍然是一种未经证实有益的研究性方法。此外,在决定对骨肉瘤采用动脉内治疗之前,应考虑副作用风险和该操作增加的成本。