Hénon P R
Institut de Recherche en Hématologie et Transfusion, Hôpital du Hasenrain, Mulhouse, France.
Stem Cells. 1993 May;11(3):154-72. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530110302.
Since the first successful attempt in 1985, peripheral blood stem cell transplants are increasingly performed worldwide and should now be considered as an essential therapeutic weapon against onco-hematological diseases. Their development has benefited greatly from a rapid concomitant advance of experimental knowledge regarding the nature of hematopoietic progenitor cells. For this reason and also for technical ones, until now these transplants generally have been autotransplants. Although one of the main reasons to use blood rather than bone marrow-derived stem cells was that they might carry less risk of relapse than autologous bone marrow cells, the lack of clinical randomized trials and/or the short follow-up make conclusions difficult so far in terms of disease-free and overall survival. Probably the risk of relapse also depends on the type of disease, on prior chemotherapies, on the type of peripheral stem cell mobilization regimen and on the number of blood-derived cells transplanted. Nevertheless, there are several major clinical indications for autologous blood stem cell transplant: acute nonlymphoblastic leukemias (ANLL), low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, multiple myeloma, some solid tumors, and even chronic myeloid leukemia. Now well-demonstrated advantages add a socioeconomic interest to this technique. The speed of post-transplant hematopoietic recovery induces a briefer hospitalization and a lower cost of the procedure, which represents "per se" important progress. Furthermore, the increasing use of hematopoietic growth factor(s) at time of blood-derived cell mobilization should increase the safety of the procedure. Also new trends are currently being developed: autotransplants with purified peripheral CD34+ cells; addition of adjuvant immunotherapy to induce graft-versus-tumor effect, which is lacking in autotransplant; and transplants using allogenic umbilical cord blood progenitors. Allogenic blood cell transplants might also be developed, provided that blood cells would be less likely to cause graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) than bone marrow, which is still not verified. Finally, the use of blood-derived cells as a vehicle for gene therapy should develop greatly in the near future.
自1985年首次成功尝试以来,外周血干细胞移植在全球范围内的开展越来越多,如今应被视为对抗血液肿瘤疾病的一项重要治疗手段。造血祖细胞性质的实验性知识迅速同步发展,极大地推动了外周血干细胞移植技术的进步。出于这个原因以及技术方面的原因,到目前为止这些移植通常都是自体移植。尽管使用血液来源而非骨髓来源的干细胞的一个主要原因是,它们可能比自体骨髓细胞携带更低的复发风险,但由于缺乏临床随机试验和/或随访时间短,就无病生存率和总生存率而言,目前很难得出结论。复发风险可能还取决于疾病类型、既往化疗情况、外周干细胞动员方案的类型以及移植的血液来源细胞数量。然而,自体血干细胞移植有几个主要的临床适应症:急性非淋巴细胞白血病(ANLL)、低度非霍奇金淋巴瘤、多发性骨髓瘤、一些实体瘤,甚至慢性粒细胞白血病。现已充分证明的优势为这项技术增添了社会经济价值。移植后造血恢复的速度加快,缩短了住院时间,降低了手术成本,这本身就是一项重要进展。此外,在血液来源细胞动员时越来越多地使用造血生长因子应该会提高手术的安全性。目前也正在出现新的趋势:使用纯化的外周血CD34+细胞进行自体移植;添加辅助免疫疗法以诱导移植物抗肿瘤效应,这在自体移植中是缺乏的;以及使用同种异体脐带血祖细胞进行移植。如果血细胞比骨髓更不容易引发移植物抗宿主病(GVHD),同种异体血细胞移植也可能会得到发展,不过这一点尚未得到证实。最后,在不久的将来,使用血液来源细胞作为基因治疗的载体有望得到极大发展。