Carter P G, Iles R K, Neven P, Davies A P, Shepherd J H, Chard T
Williamson Laboratory for Molecular Oncology, Medical College of St. Bartholomew's Hospital, University of London, West Smithfield, United Kingdom.
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Dec;51(3):368-71. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1305.
The urinary concentration of the renal metabolite of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (beta core) has been proposed as a tumor marker in certain nontrophoblastic malignancies including those of the female genital tract. A previous study investigated the use of urinary beta core in conjunction with serum CA125 in distinguishing malignant from benign pelvic masses and showed that the combined test improved the overall sensitivity to 88%; this was greater than that for either test alone. However, the cutoff levels used to distinguish normal from abnormal were approximately six times greater than those generally used for CA125 and four to five times lower than those used for beta core in our laboratory. Furthermore there was no recognition of the possible difference in normal levels of beta core between pre- and postmenopausal women. We have examined a similar group of cases using our cutoff levels for urinary beta core of 0.36 ng/ml in premenopausal women and 0.48 ng/ml in postmenopausal women and 35 u/ml for CA125. We show that measurement of CA125 is substantially more sensitive that that of beta core and that the combination of beta core with CA125 does not improve the overall sensitivity of the test. However, there was a small improvement in positive predictive value if both tests were positive (97.5%) and of specificity when one or the other test was negative (98.5%).
人绒毛膜促性腺激素β亚基的肾脏代谢产物(β核心)的尿浓度已被提议作为某些非滋养层恶性肿瘤(包括女性生殖道恶性肿瘤)的肿瘤标志物。先前的一项研究调查了尿β核心与血清CA125联合使用在区分盆腔恶性肿块与良性肿块方面的作用,结果显示联合检测可将总体敏感性提高到88%;这高于单独使用任何一种检测方法的敏感性。然而,用于区分正常与异常的临界值大约是CA125通常使用临界值的6倍,比我们实验室用于β核心的临界值低4至5倍。此外,未认识到绝经前和绝经后女性β核心正常水平可能存在的差异。我们使用我们设定的临界值对类似的一组病例进行了检测,绝经前女性尿β核心的临界值为0.36 ng/ml,绝经后女性为0.48 ng/ml,CA125为35 u/ml。我们发现,CA125检测的敏感性显著高于β核心检测,且β核心与CA125联合使用并不能提高检测的总体敏感性。然而,如果两项检测均为阳性,阳性预测值有小幅提高(97.5%),如果其中一项检测为阴性,特异性有小幅提高(98.5%)。