Collins K A, Lantz P E
Department of Pathology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
J Forensic Sci. 1994 Jan;39(1):94-9.
Firearm-related injuries are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Trauma care centers and trauma specialists (emergency medicine, trauma surgery, and neurosurgery) provide emergency care for those injured and mortally wounded from firearms. Consequently, trauma specialists may be asked to address forensic questions regarding gunshot wounds. Many firearm-related injuries are nonfatal and ultimately, fatal gunshot wounds can suffer from surgical alteration or, if the time interval between injury and death is prolonged, considerable healing of entrance and exit wounds may occur. Thus, accurate initial evaluation of firearm-related injuries is essential. We reviewed all firearm-related fatalities at our institution over the last five and a half years. Our objective was to determine how accurately trauma specialists can differentiate entrance and exit wounds in fatal perforating (exiting) gunshot wounds and determine the number of penetrating or perforating projectiles in fatal multiple gunshot wounds. A total of 271 fatal gunshot wound deaths were reviewed. Of these, we excluded all fatal penetrating (nonexiting) single gunshot wounds and fatalities not evaluated by trauma specialists. Postmortem findings were compared with the medical records from those individuals seen in the emergency department and/or admitted to North Carolina Baptist Hospital (Level I trauma center). Forty six cases with fatal multiple or exiting gunshot wounds were identified. Twenty four (52.2%) were misinterpreted by trauma specialists. Errors included inaccurate determination of the total number of multiple penetrating and/or perforating gunshot wounds and erroneous identification of entrance and exit wounds. Of the exiting, single gunshot wounds 37% were misclassified and 73.6% of multiple gunshot wounds were interpreted incorrectly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在美国,与枪支相关的伤害是发病和死亡的主要原因。创伤护理中心和创伤专科医生(急诊医学、创伤外科和神经外科医生)为那些因枪支受伤和致命的患者提供紧急护理。因此,创伤专科医生可能会被要求处理有关枪伤的法医问题。许多与枪支相关的伤害并非致命,最终,致命枪伤可能会受到手术改变,或者,如果受伤与死亡之间的时间间隔延长,伤口的入口和出口可能会有相当程度的愈合。因此,对与枪支相关的伤害进行准确的初始评估至关重要。我们回顾了过去五年半时间里我们机构所有与枪支相关的死亡案例。我们的目的是确定创伤专科医生在致命性贯通(穿出)枪伤中区分入口和出口伤口的准确程度,并确定致命多发枪伤中穿透或贯通子弹的数量。总共回顾了271例致命枪伤死亡案例。其中,我们排除了所有致命性穿透(未穿出)单枪伤以及未由创伤专科医生评估的死亡案例。将尸检结果与在急诊科就诊和/或入住北卡罗来纳浸信会医院(一级创伤中心)的患者的病历进行了比较。确定了46例致命多发或穿出性枪伤病例。24例(52.2%)被创伤专科医生误诊。错误包括对多发穿透和/或贯通枪伤总数的不准确判定以及对入口和出口伤口的错误识别。在穿出性单枪伤中,37%被错误分类,73.6%的多发枪伤被错误解读。(摘要截选至250词)