Suppr超能文献

麦克风类型和放置位置对嗓音微扰测量的影响。

Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements.

作者信息

Titze I R, Winholtz W S

机构信息

Department of Speech, Pathology and Audiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Dec;36(6):1177-90. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3606.1177.

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore the effects of microphone type (dynamic vs. condenser) and pattern (omnidirectional vs. cardioid) on the extraction of voice perturbation measures for sustained phonation. Also of interest were the effects of distance and angle between the source and the microphone. Four professional-grade and two consumer-grade microphones were selected for analysis. Synthesized phonation with different amplitude and frequency modulations at fundamental frequencies of 100 Hz and 300 Hz were presented over a loudspeaker. Human phonation was also included to test the validity of loudspeaker presentations. Three microphone distances (4 cm, 30 cm, 1 m) and three angles (0 degree, 45 degrees, 90 degrees) were used for microphone placement. Among the professional grade microphones, the cardioid condenser type had the smallest effect on perturbation measures. In general, condenser types gave better results than dynamic types. Microphones with an unbalanced output did not perform as well as those with balanced outputs. Microphone sensitivity and distance had the largest effect on perturbation measures, making it difficult to resolve normal vocal jitter at anything but a few centimeters from the mouth. Angle had little effect for short distances, but a greater effect for longer distances. These conclusions are preliminary because the sampling of microphones, distances, and signal types was very coarse. The study serves only to chart the course for future work.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨麦克风类型(动圈式与电容式)和指向性模式(全向式与心形指向式)对持续发声的嗓音扰动测量值提取的影响。声源与麦克风之间的距离和角度的影响也在研究范围内。选择了四个专业级和两个消费级麦克风进行分析。通过扬声器播放了在100赫兹和300赫兹基频下具有不同幅度和频率调制的合成发声。还纳入了人类发声来测试扬声器播放的有效性。使用了三个麦克风距离(4厘米、30厘米、1米)和三个角度(0度、45度、90度)来放置麦克风。在专业级麦克风中,心形电容式麦克风对扰动测量的影响最小。一般来说,电容式麦克风比动圈式麦克风的效果更好。输出不平衡的麦克风表现不如输出平衡的麦克风。麦克风灵敏度和距离对扰动测量的影响最大,这使得在距离嘴巴几厘米以外的地方很难分辨出正常的嗓音抖动。在短距离时角度影响较小,但在长距离时影响较大。这些结论是初步的,因为麦克风、距离和信号类型的采样非常粗略。本研究仅为未来的工作指明方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验