Novick R J, Andréassian B, Schäfers H J, Haverich A, Patterson G A, Kaye M P, Menkis A H, McKenzie F N
Division of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Mar;107(3):755-63.
An international series of pulmonary retransplantation was updated to identify the predictors of survival in the intermediate-term after reoperation for obliterative bronchiolitis. The study cohort included 32 patients with end-stage obliterative bronchiolitis who underwent retransplantation in 15 North American and European centers between 1988 and 1992. Five types of retransplantation procedures were done, including repeat ipsilateral single lung transplantation (7 patients), repeat contralateral single lung transplantation (8 patients), repeat double lung transplantation (3 patients), double lung transplantation after a previous single lung transplantation (3 patients), and single lung transplantation after a previous double lung or heart-lung transplantation (11 patients). The mean interval between transplants was 564 +/- 51 days (range 187 to 1589 days). Postoperative follow-up was 100% complete and the average follow-up in surviving patients was 678 +/- 63 days. Actuarial survival was 72%, 53%, 50%, 41%, and 33% at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Survival did not differ according to the age, preoperative diagnosis, ambulatory or ventilator status, or cytomegalovirus serologic status of the recipient before reoperation. Life-table and Cox proportional hazards analysis identified the type of retransplantation procedure and the year of reoperation as significant (p < 0.05) predictors of postoperative survival. Actuarial survival was significantly better in patients without an old, retained contralateral graft after retransplantation and in patients who underwent reoperation between 1990 and 1992, as opposed to between 1988 and 1989. Infection was the most common cause of death at all time intervals after retransplantation, although all deaths beyond 2 years resulted from obliterative bronchiolitis of the second graft. Most surviving patients are in a satisfactory clinical condition, with a mean forced expired volume in 1 second of 59% +/- 13% of predicted (repeat double lung transplant recipients) or 41% +/- 6% of predicted (repeat single lung transplant recipients). We conclude that pulmonary retransplantation for obliterative bronchiolitis is associated with significantly worse survival than after primary lung transplantation. The absence of an old contralateral graft after retransplantation and reoperation after 1989 are important predictors of survival. Additional data and follow-up are required to determine the merit of pulmonary retransplantation for obliterative bronchiolitis.
一项国际肺再移植系列研究进行了更新,以确定闭塞性细支气管炎再次手术后中期生存的预测因素。研究队列包括32例终末期闭塞性细支气管炎患者,他们于1988年至1992年间在15个北美和欧洲中心接受了再移植。进行了五种类型的再移植手术,包括同侧单肺重复移植(7例)、对侧单肺重复移植(8例)、双肺重复移植(3例)、先前单肺移植后行双肺移植(3例)以及先前双肺或心肺移植后行单肺移植(11例)。两次移植之间的平均间隔时间为564±51天(范围187至1589天)。术后随访100%完整,存活患者的平均随访时间为678±63天。1、3、6、12和24个月时的精算生存率分别为72%、53%、50%、41%和33%。再手术前受者的年龄、术前诊断、非卧床或通气状态以及巨细胞病毒血清学状态对生存率无影响。寿命表和Cox比例风险分析确定再移植手术类型和再手术年份是术后生存的显著(p<0.05)预测因素。再移植后无陈旧性对侧保留移植物的患者以及1990年至1992年间而非1988年至1989年间接受再手术的患者,精算生存率显著更高。感染是再移植后所有时间段最常见的死亡原因,尽管2年后所有死亡均由第二次移植的闭塞性细支气管炎所致。大多数存活患者临床状况良好,1秒用力呼气容积平均为预测值的59%±13%(双肺重复移植受者)或41%±6%(单肺重复移植受者)。我们得出结论,闭塞性细支气管炎的肺再移植与初次肺移植后的生存率相比显著更差。再移植后无陈旧性对侧移植物以及1989年后进行再手术是生存的重要预测因素。需要更多数据和随访来确定闭塞性细支气管炎肺再移植的价值。