Ruff C B, Walker A, Trinkaus E
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994 Jan;93(1):35-54. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330930103.
The influence of developmental factors on long-bone cross-sectional geometry and articular size in modern humans is investigated using two approaches: (1) an analysis of the effects of increased mechanical loading on long-bone structure when applied during different developmental periods, using data collected for a study of upper limb bone bilateral asymmetry in professional tennis players; and (2) an analysis of the relative timing of age changes in femoral dimensions among juveniles from the Pecos Pueblo Amerindian archaeological sample. Results of these analyses are used to interpret the femoral morphology of three pre-Recent Homo juveniles--the H. erectus KNM-WT 15000 and the archaic H. sapiens La Ferrassie 6 and Teshik-Tash 1--as well as observed differences in postcranial morphology between adult Recent and earlier Homo (Ruff et al., 1993). Our findings indicate the following: (1) There are age-related changes in long-bone diaphyseal envelope sensitivity to increased mechanical loading, with the periosteal envelope more responsive prior to mid-adolescence, and the endosteal envelope more responsive thereafter. The periosteal expansion and endosteal contraction of the diaphysis documented earlier for adult pre-Recent Homo relative to Recent humans (Ruff et al., 1993) is thus consistent with a developmental response to increased mechanical loading applied throughout life. The relatively large medullary cavity in the 11-12-year-old KNM-WT 15000 femur is also consistent with this model. However, the two archaic H. sapiens juveniles show relatively small medullary cavities, possibly indicating a modified developmental pattern in this group. (2) Articulations follow a growth pattern similar to that of long-bone length (and stature), while cross-sectional diaphyseal dimensions (cortical area, second moments of area) show a contrasting growth pattern, with slower initial growth from childhood through mid-adolescence, followed by a "catch-up" period that continues through early adulthood. This latter pattern is more similar to the growth curve for body weight, and may in fact partially reflect adaptation of the diaphysis to increased weight bearing. Because of these different growth patterns, articulations appear relatively large, and diaphyseal breadths relatively small during late childhood to mid-adolescence (i.e., about 9-13 years), when compared to adults from the same population. KNM-WT 15000 shows this same proportional difference from adult early Homo specimens, which is therefore interpreted as simply a developmental consequence of his age at death.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
(1)分析在不同发育时期施加增加的机械负荷对长骨结构的影响,使用为一项职业网球运动员上肢骨双侧不对称研究收集的数据;(2)分析来自佩科斯普韦布洛美洲印第安考古样本的青少年股骨尺寸随年龄变化的相对时间。这些分析结果用于解释三个近代以前的智人青少年——直立人KNM-WT 15000以及古老型智人拉费拉西耶6号和捷希克-塔什1号——的股骨形态,以及观察到的近代成年人与早期智人颅后形态的差异(鲁夫等人,1993年)。我们的研究结果表明:(1)长骨干骺端包膜对增加的机械负荷的敏感性存在与年龄相关的变化,骨膜包膜在青春期中期之前反应更灵敏,而骨内膜包膜在青春期中期之后反应更灵敏。因此,早期记录的近代以前的成年人相对于近代人类的骨干骨膜扩张和骨内膜收缩(鲁夫等人,1993年)与一生中对增加的机械负荷的发育反应是一致的。11至12岁的KNM-WT 15000股骨中相对较大的髓腔也与该模型一致。然而,两个古老型智人青少年的髓腔相对较小,这可能表明该群体的发育模式有所改变。(2)关节遵循与长骨长度(和身高)相似的生长模式,而骨干横截面尺寸(皮质面积、面积惯性矩)则呈现出相反的生长模式,从童年到青春期中期初始生长较慢,随后是持续到成年早期的“追赶”期。后一种模式与体重增长曲线更相似,实际上可能部分反映了骨干对增加的负重的适应。由于这些不同的生长模式,在儿童晚期到青春期中期(即大约9至13岁),与同群体的成年人相比,关节显得相对较大,骨干宽度相对较小。KNM-WT 15000与成年早期智人标本显示出相同的比例差异,因此这被解释为仅仅是其死亡年龄的发育结果。(摘要截断于400字)