Sears D H, Leeman M I, Jassy L J, O'Donnell L A, Allen S G, Reisner L S
Department of Anesthesiology, Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92103.
J Clin Anesth. 1994 Jan-Feb;6(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(94)90117-1.
To compare the frequency of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in obstetric patients when using the 24-gauge or the larger 22-gauge Sprotte needle.
Prospective, randomized study.
Four hospitals.
375 ASA physical status I and II cesarean section and postpartum tubal ligation patients.
Obstetric patients were randomly assigned to receive spinal anesthesia via a midline dural puncture using the 24-gauge or the 22-gauge Sprotte needle.
The rate of PDPH was determined by a postoperative visit by the anesthesiologist as well as questioning patients by telephone 1 week or more after discharge. In the 24-gauge Sprotte needle group (n = 186), 2 mild and 1 moderate PDPHs were reported, for an overall rate of 1.61%. In the 22-gauge Sprotte needle group (n = 189), 2 mild and 1 moderate PDPHs were reported, for an overall rate of 1.59%. All headaches except 1 resolved within 72 hours with conservative treatment. One patient from the 22-gauge Sprotte needle group required an epidural blood patch. There were no failed blocks in either group.
Our results suggest that the 22-gauge Sprotte needle, when compared with the smaller 24-gauge Sprotte needle, can be used in obstetric patients without increasing the frequency of PDPH.