Henderson V J, Smith R S, Fry W R, Morabito D, Peskin G W, Barkan H, Organ C H
Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis-East Bay (Highland General Hospital), Oakland 94602.
J Trauma. 1994 Mar;36(3):341-8.
Retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of 251 patients treated for cardiac injuries at Highland General Hospital trauma facility in Alameda County, California, to identify factors that contribute to patient survival and predict death. Thirty-six patients (14%) had blunt injuries, 153 patients (61%) had gunshot wounds (GSW), and 62 patients (25%) had stab wounds. The overall survival rate was 18.7%, GSW survival was 6.5%, stab wound survival was 37.1%, and blunt injury survival was 40%. Patients who arrived with some vital signs had 62.2% survival and patients who arrived with absent vital signs had < 1% survival. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that for patients with absent vital signs the only significant predictor of outcome was GSW as the mechanism of injury and for patients with vital signs the ISS and the presence of combined right and left heart injuries were significant independent predictors of outcome. We conclude that the routine and aggressive use of emergency room thoracotomy for patients with penetrating cardiac injury must be re-examined.
对加利福尼亚州阿拉米达县高地综合医院创伤中心收治的251例心脏损伤患者的病历进行回顾性分析,以确定有助于患者生存和预测死亡的因素。36例患者(14%)为钝性损伤,153例患者(61%)为枪伤(GSW),62例患者(25%)为刺伤。总体生存率为18.7%,枪伤生存率为6.5%,刺伤生存率为37.1%,钝性损伤生存率为40%。有一些生命体征的患者生存率为62.2%,无生命体征的患者生存率<1%。逐步多元逻辑回归分析显示,对于无生命体征的患者,损伤机制为枪伤是唯一显著的预后预测因素;对于有生命体征的患者,损伤严重度评分(ISS)以及合并左右心损伤是显著的独立预后预测因素。我们得出结论,对于穿透性心脏损伤患者,必须重新审视急诊室开胸手术的常规和积极应用。