Kaplan E H, Lilley M D, Schaefer R F, Cade B, Desai A, Padva A, Orbach H G
Public Health Rep. 1975 May-Jun;90(3):223-30.
In a study in the laboratories of the Chicago Board of Health, the results from determination of lead in paint films by X-ray fluorescence were compared with results from determination by atomic absorption. Portable instruments of three suppliers were used for X-ray fluorescence measurements. An improved version of one of these instruments was also tested. The results of X-ray fluorescence readings on painted card stock panels with one of these instruments compared satisfactorily with the results as determined by the atomic absorption method at levels below 10 mg of lead per square centimeter. Readings on multiple layers of these panels were additive and independent of the order of these panels. All four instruments were tested in the laboratory on painted surfaces from the walls of condemned buildings. The most recent version of each instrument gave a correlation coefficient of 0.96 or better for the linear regression of lead values in milligrams per square centimeter by atomic absorption against instrument readings. It was calculated that a reading of 3.2 or greater on any of the instruments would indicate with greater than 95 percent confidence that 1 mg or more of lead per square centimeter would be found when a sample of the paint was analyzed by atomic absorption. When the readings of one of the instruments showed lead to be absent, that result would inidcate with better than 95 percent confidence that less than 1 mg of lead per square centimeter would be found by the atomic absorption method. Portable X-ray fluorescence instruments can be used in situ to determine whether the walls of a building give readings for lead above the range of 0 to 3.2. Walls with readings above this range can be considered to have 1 mg or more of lead per square centimeter and would not be in conformance with the code of the City of Chicago. Samples would need to be taken for analysis in the laboratory by atomic absorption only from those walls with readings within the range of 0 to 3.2.
在芝加哥卫生局实验室进行的一项研究中,将通过X射线荧光法测定漆膜中铅含量的结果与原子吸收法测定的结果进行了比较。使用了三家供应商的便携式仪器进行X射线荧光测量。还对其中一台仪器的改进版本进行了测试。使用其中一台仪器对涂漆卡片纸面板进行X射线荧光读数的结果,与原子吸收法在每平方厘米铅含量低于10毫克时测定的结果相比,令人满意。这些面板多层的读数具有加和性,且与面板顺序无关。所有四台仪器均在实验室中对被拆除建筑物墙壁上的涂漆表面进行了测试。每台仪器的最新版本,对于每平方厘米铅含量以毫克计的原子吸收法测定的铅值与仪器读数的线性回归,给出的相关系数为0.96或更高。经计算,任何一台仪器读数为3.2或更高时,有超过95%的置信度表明,当对油漆样品进行原子吸收分析时,每平方厘米会发现1毫克或更多的铅。当其中一台仪器的读数显示无铅时,该结果有超过95%的置信度表明,通过原子吸收法每平方厘米会发现少于1毫克的铅。便携式X射线荧光仪器可用于现场测定建筑物墙壁的铅读数是否高于0至3.2的范围。读数高于此范围的墙壁可被认为每平方厘米有1毫克或更多的铅,不符合芝加哥市的法规。仅需从读数在0至3.2范围内的那些墙壁上采集样品,在实验室中通过原子吸收法进行分析。