Yoshida N, Ueno M, Saita N, Hirashima M
Department of Pathology, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1994;104 Suppl 1(1):9-11. doi: 10.1159/000236736.
Human mononuclear leukocytes (MNL), probably OKT4-positive T cells, produced an eosinophil chemotactic factor (ECF) when they were cocultured with irradiated BALL-1, a B cell lymphoma line. Treatment of MNL, with anti-IL-2 antibody failed to suppress BALL-1-induced ECF production. Periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde-fixed but not acetone- and ethanol-fixed BCLL induced evident ECF production. These results suggested that some cell surface molecules play a role in the induction of ECF production. Isoelectric point of BALL-1-induced ECF was around pH7, whereas that of IL-2-induced ECF was around pH 5. The molecular weight of BALL-1-induced ECF was between 10 and 30 kD. Although a combination of MoAb against IL-3, IL-5, and GM, CSF suppressed the activity of IL-2-induced ECF, it failed to suppress that of BALL-1-induced ECF. Furthermore, BALL-1-induced ECF suppressed fMLP-induced respiratory bursts of eosinophils, while IL-2-induced ECF failed. We propose that at least one reason for eosinophil infiltrate into the stroma of tumors is that the tumor cells stimulate T cells to produce BALL-1-induced ECF, and the eosinophils attracted by the ECF exhibit different functions from those by other ECF.
人单核白细胞(MNL),可能是OKT4阳性T细胞,与经照射的B细胞淋巴瘤系BALL-1共培养时会产生嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子(ECF)。用抗IL-2抗体处理MNL未能抑制BALL-1诱导的ECF产生。经高碘酸盐-赖氨酸-多聚甲醛固定而非丙酮和乙醇固定的慢性淋巴细胞白血病细胞诱导明显的ECF产生。这些结果表明一些细胞表面分子在ECF产生的诱导中起作用。BALL-1诱导的ECF的等电点约为pH7,而IL-2诱导的ECF的等电点约为pH5。BALL-1诱导的ECF的分子量在10至30kD之间。尽管抗IL-3、IL-5和GM-CSF的单克隆抗体组合抑制了IL-2诱导的ECF的活性,但未能抑制BALL-1诱导的ECF的活性。此外,BALL-1诱导的ECF抑制了fMLP诱导的嗜酸性粒细胞呼吸爆发,而IL-2诱导的ECF则未能抑制。我们提出嗜酸性粒细胞浸润肿瘤基质的至少一个原因是肿瘤细胞刺激T细胞产生BALL-1诱导的ECF,并且被该ECF吸引的嗜酸性粒细胞表现出与其他ECF所吸引的嗜酸性粒细胞不同的功能。